A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lunar lander ideas over the decades



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 18th 20, 01:00 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

In article ,
says...

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...0190031985.pdf
I ended up skimming it after awhile, but a LOT of details.

My only regret is I wish they had more details on some of the Apollo LM
derivatives such as the LM Truck and other ideas for post-Apollo.


Agreed. This is more of a collection of lunar lander studies done post-
Apollo. What stuck me was the wide variation in solutions. Also the
fact that we've literally been studying this for decades. This is what
analysis paralysis looks like.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
  #2  
Old June 19th 20, 09:13 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

Hi all,

Can anyone give me an idea of the size of this file? My browser has downloaded 45 MB and still says its Progress is 0%.

Is there a lower-resolution version somewhere?

Thanks and regards
Frank
  #4  
Old June 22nd 20, 07:58 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

Hi all,

On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 5:09:15 PM UTC+2, Alain Fournier wrote:

467.1 MB


Thanks. That's going to have to wait a while then. Way too big to fit down the 2G pipeline I'm currently using to connect to the Internet.

Now if the local telecomm provider (read: government enforced monopoly) would just do their jobs and fix our landline....


Alain Fournier



Regards
Frank
  #7  
Old June 25th 20, 02:39 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 752
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

"David Spain" wrote in message ...

On 2020-06-22 2:00 PM, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Jun/22/2020 at 02:58, wrote :
Hi all,

On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 5:09:15 PM UTC+2, Alain Fournier wrote:

467.1 MB

Thanks. That's going to have to wait a while then. Way too big to fit
down the 2G pipeline I'm currently using to connect to the Internet.

Now if the local telecomm provider (read: government enforced monopoly)
would just do their jobs and fix our landline....


???

I'm curious here. Where are you hailing from? Which country imposes such
horrible hardship on its citizens?


Alain Fournier


FWIW Verizon is *planning* on shutting down 2G/CDMA service in December*!

2G has evolved over time a from whopping 9.6 to 236.8 kbps on the download
side! Can you run wget on your phone?


Oh you meant 2G as in phone tech... not as in 2GB! No wonder I was confused.

The 2000s want their flip-phone back!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2G

*Note to Self: There goes the ol' Samsung flip-phone!

Dave


--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net
IT Disaster Response -
https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Resp...dp/1484221834/

  #8  
Old June 25th 20, 08:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

On Monday, June 22, 2020 at 8:00:22 PM UTC+2, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Jun/22/2020 at 02:58, wrote :

Now if the local telecomm provider (read: government enforced monopoly) would just do their jobs and fix our landline....


???

I'm curious here. Where are you hailing from? Which country imposes such
horrible hardship on its citizens?


South Africa, a semi-government owned company called TELKOM has the monopoly on all cable based telecomms. There was another company whose name escapes me right now but they went belly up when ESKOM's problems started a decade ago. In 1996 the new(ish) government promised to dismantle this legacy of apartheid ASAP and usher in a new era of prosperity. I guess they figured out that seeing as the Cabinet gets to (indirectly) appoint the leadership of state-owned companies that keeping TELKOM was a good way to keep friends and supports gainfully employed.

We have a similar situation with ESKOM, the electricity provider monopoly, who has major problems keeping the lights on. Their cabinet appointed leadership can't figure out why 40-year old power stations keep breaking down, or why coal suppliers refuse to supply coal when they haven't been paid in three months, and whose leadership gets hysterical when they can't figure out WHY the company has a 25% decline in income during a period when the parts of the country that actually pay for their electricity were being turned off for 25% of the time. Oh and the new power station (was supposed to be the biggest, most efficient, least polluting coal burning power station in the Southern Hemisphere) is 10 X over budget, 10 years later, and all work done so far has been found to be defective, or sub-standard. Estimates are that it will be 20 X over budget and won't be fully operation before 2040.

We also had a government owned iron and steel monopoly, ISKOR, which except for some minor low volume specialist metallurgy has gone the way of the dinosaurs. The state-owned national airline SAA hasn't paid its staff in 3 months, and before that they weren't on full pay anyway. It has just received another billion dollar rescue package. We have a government owned monopoly on rail transport, and they can't even get the trains to run on time, or prevent the passenger trains from being torched in arson attacks. Our ports are run another monopoly which makes getting your good through customs an exercise in frustration.

And yes, 2G is scheduled to go away here soon too. The rights to those wave lengths of that transmission space have already been sold. The wireless operators don't really mind, because that means they get to sell everyone who wants to stay connected a 4G or LTE device.



Alain Fournier



Sorry for the long winded reply. An update on my landline connection. The connection is restored but I still can't use it because the modem's software can't reset the password used by the last device. I got this far by waiting patiently on the phone for just over 75 minutes yesterday.

Be grateful for what you have over in the real world.

Regards
Frank
  #10  
Old June 26th 20, 02:08 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 752
Default Lunar lander ideas over the decades

wrote in message
...

On Monday, June 22, 2020 at 8:00:22 PM UTC+2, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Jun/22/2020 at 02:58, wrote :

Now if the local telecomm provider (read: government enforced monopoly)
would just do their jobs and fix our landline....


???

I'm curious here. Where are you hailing from? Which country imposes such
horrible hardship on its citizens?


South Africa, a semi-government owned company called TELKOM has the
monopoly on all cable based telecomms. There was another company whose name
escapes me right now but they went belly up when ESKOM's problems started a
decade ago. In 1996 the new(ish) government promised to dismantle this
legacy of apartheid ASAP and usher in a new era of prosperity. I guess they
figured out that seeing as the Cabinet gets to (indirectly) appoint the
leadership of state-owned companies that keeping TELKOM was a good way to
keep friends and supports gainfully employed.

We have a similar situation with ESKOM, the electricity provider monopoly,
who has major problems keeping the lights on. Their cabinet appointed
leadership can't figure out why 40-year old power stations keep breaking
down, or why coal suppliers refuse to supply coal when they haven't been
paid in three months, and whose leadership gets hysterical when they can't
figure out WHY the company has a 25% decline in income during a period when
the parts of the country that actually pay for their electricity were being
turned off for 25% of the time. Oh and the new power station (was supposed
to be the biggest, most efficient, least polluting coal burning power
station in the Southern Hemisphere) is 10 X over budget, 10 years later,
and all work done so far has been found to be defective, or sub-standard.
Estimates are that it will be 20 X over budget and won't be fully operation
before 2040.

We also had a government owned iron and steel monopoly, ISKOR, which except
for some minor low volume specialist metallurgy has gone the way of the
dinosaurs. The state-owned national airline SAA hasn't paid its staff in 3
months, and before that they weren't on full pay anyway. It has just
received another billion dollar rescue package. We have a government owned
monopoly on rail transport, and they can't even get the trains to run on
time, or prevent the passenger trains from being torched in arson attacks.
Our ports are run another monopoly which makes getting your good through
customs an exercise in frustration.

And yes, 2G is scheduled to go away here soon too. The rights to those wave
lengths of that transmission space have already been sold. The wireless
operators don't really mind, because that means they get to sell everyone
who wants to stay connected a 4G or LTE device.



Alain Fournier



Sorry for the long winded reply. An update on my landline connection. The
connection is restored but I still can't use it because the modem's
software can't reset the password used by the last device. I got this far
by waiting patiently on the phone for just over 75 minutes yesterday.

Be grateful for what you have over in the real world.

Regards
Frank


I was on a Zoom chat with a bunch of fellow DBAs and one was from South
Africa and she was talking about an upcoming power outage because of the
factors you mention.

--
Greg D. Moore
http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net
IT Disaster Response -
https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Resp...dp/1484221834/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lunar Lander Jeff Findley[_6_] Policy 15 December 26th 17 11:33 PM
Why LH2/LOX for lunar lander? [email protected] Policy 5 May 11th 06 05:42 PM
Lunar Lander in a 5.2m faring? Alex Terrell Policy 30 October 30th 05 12:55 AM
aborting a lunar lander Jud McCranie History 28 August 26th 04 09:46 PM
Gulf Oil Lunar Lander Scott Lowther History 4 June 6th 04 02:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.