![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/9/2020 10:07 AM, David Spain wrote:
On 6/8/2020 6:24 PM, JF Mezei wrote: How can they run only the pre-burners? Wouldn't that run turbopumps that would push a lot of unburned methane and oxygen out of the engine bell , risking ignotion when it sees a spark or a falme at the landing site? Yes I would assume so. There is a risk of ignition outside the engine until the methane gas dissipates to below about a 6% methane/air ratio. Below that it isn't methane rich enough to ignite. Or can they adjust mixes so that they have full burn of methane in both the pre-burners so the the exchaust no longer contains combustible gases? Another thought, all the test firings I've seen so far of SN4 have been very very short. So if they did run a preburner only test, it was for so short a period of time there was very little volume of gas ejected from the engine to be that hazardous. Pressure can also be controlled by limited tank venting as well. Stay below 6% ambient mix and nothing will happen. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tank Pressurization on Starship | David Spain | Policy | 5 | May 24th 20 08:08 PM |
Tank Pressurization on Starship | David Spain | Policy | 2 | May 23rd 20 08:29 PM |
Nervy pressurization method | Pat Flannery | History | 6 | November 17th 06 04:54 PM |
Russian Soyuz Landing Capsule Has Pressurization Problem During Descent | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 6 | October 15th 05 07:26 PM |
Propellant pressurization | Iain McClatchie | Technology | 14 | February 1st 04 03:29 AM |