![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17-May-20 6:58 pm, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/17/20 12:38 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 17-May-20 6:58 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. it helps if you stop kidding us. it helps if you stop contemptuous behavior against pnn. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17-May-20 9:41 pm, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/17/20 12:38 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 17-May-20 6:58 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. it helps if you stop kidding us. it helps if you stop contemptuous behavior against pnn. How can I be contemptuous of something that doesn't exist? Sylvia. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/17/20 2:09 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 17-May-20 9:41 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 12:38 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 17-May-20 6:58 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. it helps if you stop kidding us. it helps if you stop contemptuous behavior against pnn. How can I be contemptuous of something that doesn't exist? Sylvia. see? it is your fault if we insult you. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il giorno domenica 17 maggio 2020 14:21:06 UTC+2, Doctor Who ha scritto:
On 5/17/20 2:09 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 17-May-20 9:41 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 12:38 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 17-May-20 6:58 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 10:52 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: On 16-May-20 4:57 pm, wrote: NASA/MUSK should stop before starting with the Artemis project which in my opinion is more dangerous than the space shuttle project. Since 50 years rocketry is not able to perform manned outposts on the Moon and Mars for the simple fact that not even 1% of the Apollo 11 mass returned to earth. www.asps.it The space shuttle was a dangerously flawed design that put back US space travel several decades. As far as I can see, no one has died during a spaceflight due to the failure of a liquid fueled rocket. This doesn't mean it can't happen of course, but it does suggest that the risks are being managed. Sylvia. are you kidding us? 14 astronauts have died. It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. it helps if you stop kidding us. it helps if you stop contemptuous behavior against pnn. How can I be contemptuous of something that doesn't exist? Sylvia. see? it is your fault if we insult you. Mr. Who do not get angry and oppose the majority who believe that we will have permanent human outposts on the Moon and Mars with these comic suppositories for giants http://www.asps.it/suppostespaziali.jpg :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/18/20 1:51 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , lid says... On 17-May-20 9:41 pm, Doctor Who wrote: On 5/17/20 12:38 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: It helps if you read all of the comment. Sylvia. it helps if you stop kidding us. it helps if you stop contemptuous behavior against pnn. How can I be contemptuous of something that doesn't exist? I've gotta side with Sylvia on this one. I'm a hair's width away from putting "Doctor Who" in my killfile because of this "pnn" fantasy. Jeff you are a stupid person. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA considers orbital outpost near moon as next big project | [email protected] | Policy | 18 | October 1st 12 12:37 AM |
NASA considers outpost beyond moon's far side | [email protected] | Policy | 12 | February 18th 12 06:41 AM |
NASA plans to put astronauts back on moon by 2018, using old Ap... | Michael Baldwin Bruce | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 21st 05 12:29 PM |
Outpost, a longtime NASA tavern, damaged by fire | Jorge R. Frank | History | 21 | February 9th 05 12:31 PM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |