![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Must we topple Einstein to let physics leap forward again?" https://newscientist.com/article/mg2...forward-again/
"Saving time: Physics killed it. Do we need it back? [...] Einstein landed the fatal blow at the turn of the 20th century." https://www.newscientist.com/article...-need-it-back/ "Bye bye space-time: is it time to free physics from Einstein's legacy?" https://www.newscientist.com/article...steins-legacy/ Einstein managed to convince the gullible world that a nonsense he had "borrowed" from the nonexistent ether - "the speed of light is constant" - is a non-negotiable truth. The nonsense proved to be highly malignant - its metastases permeated and eventually killed the whole field of science called physics: Albert Einstein: "...I introduced the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light, which I borrowed from H. A. Lorentz's theory of the stationary luminiferous ether..." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory Brian Greene: What does it mean for the speed of light to be constant? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Irlq3TFr8Q John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm "The speaker Joao Magueijo, is a Reader in Theoretical Physics at Imperial College, London and author of Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation. He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html In the next version of fundamental physics Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom "The speed of light is constant" will be replaced with the correct axiom "For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is constant". I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: Climax of Einstein Fraud | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 8th 20 10:50 PM |
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: Obvious Fraud | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 2nd 19 12:04 PM |
Simultaneous Arrival of Optical Signals and Gravitational Waves inLIGO's GW170817 Experiment | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | November 12th 18 09:03 AM |
Exclusive: Grave doubts over LIGO’s discovery of gravitational waves | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 2nd 18 02:46 PM |
Why LIGO's Discovery of Gravitational Waves Is a Fraud | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | October 27th 16 11:35 PM |