![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 11:40:11 PM UTC, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 11:03:07 PM UTC-8, Gerald Kelleher wrote: On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 4:28:23 AM UTC, palsing wrote: On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 11:23:06 AM UTC-8, Gerald Kelleher wrote: Just discovered the Soho Lasco imaging and it is fascinating... ... and has been fascinating for the last 30 years! You are just a little late to the party... Even you now can say that previously astronomers believed that the direct/retrogrades of Venus and Mercury were gauged against the background stars, after all, this is the flawed animation you provided before - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYYwNvjr7Lg Except... it is not flawed, it is exactly what you would see from the surface of the Earth if only the Sun was not so bright and often 'in the way'. It happens that wider society is coming around to the actual common sense perspective where Venus and Mercury run back and forth in front and then behind the Sun where the Sun is central to that perspective and the Earth's orbital motion is accounted by the change in position of the background stars from left to right of the Sun. https://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data...current_c3.gif This is happening right now in the direction of the stationary Sun so having a satellite with the ability to both screen out the Sun's glare and celestial sphere rotation offers observers a picture of the inner solar system from the orbital motion of the planet. You understand this is for those who can add to the resolution for the direct/retrogrades of the slower moving planets with a new understanding of the motion of the faster planets inclusive of our orbital motion. If you want to believe Venus doesn't show a closed loop with the Sun at the centre then be my guest, this type of astronomy is not for everyone. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:37:02 AM UTC-8, Gerald Kelleher wrote:
If you want to believe Venus doesn't show a closed loop with the Sun at the centre then be my guest, this type of astronomy is not for everyone. I never made that claim, Gerald, I only reminded you that apparent planetary motion with respect to the Sun is not the only perspective. In your case, it seems to be the case that apparent planetary motion with respect to the fixed stars is not for you... but I can assure you that it is still astronomy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 8:14:20 PM UTC, palsing wrote:
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:37:02 AM UTC-8, Gerald Kelleher wrote: If you want to believe Venus doesn't show a closed loop with the Sun at the centre then be my guest, this type of astronomy is not for everyone. I never made that claim, Gerald, I only reminded you that apparent planetary motion with respect to the Sun is not the only perspective. In your case, it seems to be the case that apparent planetary motion with respect to the fixed stars is not for you... but I can assure you that it is still astronomy. The people I respect are Galileo and the original Sun centred astronomers who never knew this perspective as they assigned the back and forth motions of Venus and Mercury as illusions caused by the Earth's orbital motion - "Now what is said here of Jupiter is to be understood of Saturn and Mars also. In Saturn these retrogressions are somewhat more frequent than in Jupiter, because its motion is slower than Jupiter's, so that the Earth overtakes it in a shorter time. In Mars they are rarer, its motion being faster than that of Jupiter, so that the Earth spends more time in catching up with it. Next, as to Venus and Mercury, whose circles are included within that of the Earth, stoppings and retrograde motions appear in them also, due not to any motion that really exists in them, but to the annual motion of the Earth. This is acutely demonstrated by Copernicus . . ." Galileo These were great people who could rightly celebrate half a solution as the illusory loops of the slower moving planets are discerned against a fixed stellar background - https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap181108.html There is so much going on with the direct/retrogrades of the faster moving Venus and Mercury that only satellite footage could resolve their motions and ours around the Sun. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mercury today | Gerald Kelleher | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | September 6th 16 03:35 PM |
ASTRO: Mercury & Jupiter on New Year's Eve - Mercury&JupiterThroughTrees3.JPG | MomDude | Astro Pictures | 0 | January 1st 09 04:27 AM |
ASTRO: Mercury & Jupiter on New Year's Eve - Mercury&JupiterThroughTrees1.JPG (1/1) | MomDude | Astro Pictures | 0 | January 1st 09 04:25 AM |
ASTRO: Mercury & Jupiter on New Year's Eve - Mercury&JupiterThroughTrees1.JPG (0/1) | MomDude | Astro Pictures | 0 | January 1st 09 04:25 AM |
Psychological terroristic wars (today a psycho is watching me) | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 08 10:36 PM |