![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:19:13 -0400, Davoud wrote:
Chris L Peterson: Also, even if Mars is dead now, there's a very real possibility that it wasn't always so, and that evidence of past life will be found. If Venus ever had life, it is beyond discovery. Unless it's not "life as we know it." Improbable, but not impossible. And Venus is recently resurfaced, which means it's much less useful than Mars for understanding the developmental processes of the Solar System. Agreed. Useful mainly to amateur astrophotographers for producing pretty pictures. Are you saying that you think remnants from ancient life could be more persistent than geological features? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mars: As dead as Venus ever was? | Rich[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | February 16th 08 01:01 AM |
Venus is alive, Mars is dead | BradGuth | Policy | 20 | September 18th 07 02:57 AM |
Venus is alive, Mars is dead | BradGuth | History | 20 | September 18th 07 02:57 AM |
Venus is alive, Mars is dead | BradGuth | UK Astronomy | 20 | September 18th 07 02:57 AM |
Terraforming the moon, long before doing Mars or Venus | Brad Guth | Policy | 21 | March 4th 07 01:44 AM |