Now Everyone Can be Happy

At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

On Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:41:58 UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

Redirect:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...global-warming

On Friday, 8 June 2018 02:34:26 UTC+2, RichA wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 12:41:58 UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

Redirect:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...global-warming

Their thread count is more irrelevant [and irreverent] than ours but a lot funnier.
Shouldn't we send 1437½ over there to captain an away friendly match?
A sort of season warm-up? ;-)
Denmark is fast approaching a record drought after the warmest and sunniest May ever recorded in 140 years.
We may yet have massive crop failure, a Dust Bowl and forest fires but it's not AGW.
Accepting AGW would mean accepting the 21 recently broken, monthly _serial_ heat records are all very real and not just "continuing fine weather."
Denmark comes near the bottom of Europe on using green energy and electric car sales but has the world's highest taxes on domestic electricity.
Denmark, all the sunshine but none of the beaches. ;-)

On Thursday, 7 June 2018 18:41:58 UTC+2, Quadibloc wrote:
At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

What about taking petrol fumes out of the air and converting them to more fuel?

VW diesel smog is another missed opportunity for producing cheap carbon. You can never have enough carbon in the atmosphere. ;-)

On Friday, 8 June 2018 01:40:59 UTC-4, Chris.B wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 18:41:58 UTC+2, Quadibloc wrote:
At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

What about taking petrol fumes out of the air and converting them to more fuel?

VW diesel smog is another missed opportunity for producing cheap carbon. You can never have enough carbon in the atmosphere. ;-)

How about not squandering the future on B.S. technologies that cost a fortune and produce ZERO products?

On Friday, 29 June 2018 02:45:35 UTC+2, RichA wrote:
On Friday, 8 June 2018 01:40:59 UTC-4, Chris.B wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 18:41:58 UTC+2, Quadibloc wrote:
At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

What about taking petrol fumes out of the air and converting them to more fuel?

VW diesel smog is another missed opportunity for producing cheap carbon. You can never have enough carbon in the atmosphere. ;-)

How about not squandering the future on B.S. technologies that cost a fortune and produce ZERO products?

The world has run out of CO2!
Factories and breweries are closing down due to the acute shortage.

On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 10:41:58 AM UTC-6, Quadibloc wrote:

At least if this technology is what it's claimed to be:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...-study/562289/

John Savard

Ver-r-ry interesting. There's always more than one way to skin a cat.
And they can use solar, wind or nuclear power to supply the needed energy.

On Friday, 29 June 2018 16:22:22 UTC+2, Gary Harnagel wrote:

And they can use solar, wind or nuclear power to supply the needed energy.

Who is "they?" The 0.1% have no need of anything.
In a few short years "they" will own the entire galaxy.
They will have become gods in their own eyes.
For no others will survive to worship them.