![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 22, 2018 at 3:46:09 AM UTC-6, Martin Brown wrote:
On 20/06/2018 20:21, Gary Harnagel wrote: On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:39:43 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote: But clouds reduce the heat flux coming up from the surface. No, they don't. But the clouds do radiate IR radiation back to the ground. And since the clouds are cooler than the ground, the clouds also reduce IR radiation out into space. Maybe that's what you meant. I'm talking about the NET effect. Clouds reduce the amount of heat escaping into space, but they also reduce the amount of solar energy coming in. The net effect depends both on the height and *type* of the cloud. See the options in MODTRAN. High cirrus is optically thin, cold and lets in plenty of solar energy but is dense to outgoing thermal radiation and have a net warming effect. It's not that simple: https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publ...-pool-microphy Low optically dense clouds reflect a high proportion of incoming solar radiation are warm and have a slight net cooling effect - although their main effect is to significantly reduce diurnal temperature variation. Deep convective clouds tend to be just about neutral for energy balance. See: http://nenes.eas.gatech.edu/Cloud/NASAClouds.pdf For a reasonably accessible review. -- Regards, Martin Brown "The balance between the cooling and warming actions of clouds is very close although, overall, averaging the effects of all the clouds around the globe, cooling predominates." The gatech link is pretty old but did mention a NASA program (CERES) which was launched just last year: https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/ "A new study suggests that most global climate models may underestimate the amount of rain that will fall in Earth's tropical regions as our planet continues to warm. That's because these models underestimate decreases in high clouds over the tropics seen in recent NASA observations, according to research led by scientist Hui Su of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California." So more outgoing radiation? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermodynamics: Dismal Swamp of Obscurity or Just Dead Science? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 27th 17 11:41 AM |
Thermodynamics: Dismal Swamp of Obscurity | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | October 1st 17 06:05 PM |
Clifford Truesdell: Thermodynamics Is a Dismal Swamp of Obscurity | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 2nd 17 05:12 PM |
REPLY TO GLOBAL WARMING DENIER | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 15 | May 29th 07 05:25 AM |
STERN REPLY TO GLOBAL WARMING DENIER | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 11 | March 4th 07 12:42 AM |