![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 11:34:12 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:43:15 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: On Friday, 1 December 2017 20:41:25 UTC-5, palsing wrote: This is so cool! https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.p...ly201 71201-1 "If you tried to start a car that's been sitting in a garage for decades, you might not expect the engine to respond. But a set of thrusters aboard the Voyager 1 spacecraft successfully fired up Wednesday after 37 years without use..." Thank goodness for miracle of radio-thermal generators. Still providing 300 watts of power after all these years. They're a great way to power deep space probes. But they weren't the remarkable thing here. The remarkable thing was that moving parts actually moved after decades in a vacuum. That's a very tricky thing to manage. That, and unless they built it at -270 deg. C, they would have had to be very careful with mechanical tolerances. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sun-Earth Explorer Probe fires thrusters after 25+ years of inactivity ... | Hägar | Misc | 0 | July 4th 14 05:08 PM |
Mach-Lorentz thrusters? | John Schilling | Policy | 6 | May 21st 06 01:08 AM |
Ion Thrusters: HDLT vs DS4G | manofsanATyahoo.com | Technology | 3 | January 19th 06 08:45 AM |
Gemini maneuvering thrusters | Bill | History | 12 | July 19th 05 05:10 PM |
Privately-built ion thrusters? | Neil Halelamien | Policy | 3 | February 4th 05 09:11 AM |