![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose Suro" wrote in message . com... Interesting to note the differences on the two films. First, the grain is more apparent on the 400f, but I also noticed the tonal range is shortened as well. Right; high-speed films tend to be like that. Elite Chrome 200 less than most... you might try it. On the 400f's behalf, being able to shoot at 1/500th of a second makes for consistently sharper pictures - free of most atmospheric turbulence. More to the point, it also "stops" the vibration from your camera's shutter. http://web.tampabay.rr.com/jsuro/10_...n_10072003.htm Nice! -- Michael Covington Author, Astrophotography for the Amateur www.covingtoninnovations.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |