![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/14/2016 2:06 PM, Yuri Kreaton wrote:
key to his argument is; "The researchers found using statistical analysis of the number of citations to 2,000 articles in a leading physics journal, that articles are less likely to be referenced by other physicists if they have lots of mathematical equations on each page." but that is BS, as obviously the most referenced papers are the ones with a new key piece of knowledge discovered, or derrived in them. Anyone that has worked or researched in the professional journals knows this. And those papers are not dependent upon the amount of math in them, some have a little, some have a lot. So I think this author laid an egg with this, it is bogus. Well, it isn't the first time that a study made a wrong correlation. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hate Denial and Math | Kevin Barry | Misc | 6 | September 3rd 13 10:44 PM |
New Study Shows Very First Stars Not Monstrous | jacob navia[_5_] | Research | 5 | November 17th 11 06:37 AM |
Magnetic flows cause sunspot lows, study shows | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 12th 10 06:01 AM |
Atmospheric Study Shows Similarities in Sun's Effects on Earth and Mars | [email protected] | News | 0 | May 25th 06 12:37 AM |
NASA Study Shows Water Could Create Gullies on Mars | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 4th 05 03:02 AM |