The Lie That the Speed of Light Is Constant

The lie that the Michelson-Morley experiment confirmed the constancy of the speed of light was devised by Einstein:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstrac...66838A 639EDE
The New York Times, April 19, 1921: "The special relativity arose from the question of whether light had an invariable velocity in free space, he [Einstein] said. The velocity of light could only be measured relative to a body or a co-ordinate system. He sketched a co-ordinate system K to which light had a velocity C. Whether the system was in motion or not was the fundamental principle. This has been developed through the researches of Maxwell and Lorentz, the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light having been based on many of their experiments. But did it hold for only one system? he asked. He gave the example of a street and a vehicle moving on that street. If the velocity of light was C for the street was it also C for the vehicle? If a second co-ordinate system K was introduced, moving with the velocity V, did light have the velocity of C here? When the light traveled the system moved with it, so it would appear that light moved slower and the principle apparently did not hold. Many famous experiments had been made on this point. Michelson showed that relative to the moving co-ordinate system K1, the light traveled with the same velocity as relative to K, which is contrary to the above observation. How could this be reconciled? Professor Einstein asked."

The lie has been universally taught for more than a century. Ten years ago, the only living Einsteinians that used to mention the truth about the Michelson-Morley experiment were John Norton and John Stachel (but they never stopped lying about other things of course):

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "In addition to his work as editor of the Einstein papers in finding source material, Stachel assembled the many small clues that reveal Einstein's serious consideration of an emission theory of light; and he gave us the crucial insight that Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost universally use it as support for the light postulate of special relativity. Even today, this point needs emphasis. The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that contradicts the light postulate."

Nowadays clever Einsteinians know the truth and tend to avoid the topic. Silly Einsteinians (99%) teach the lie as enthusiastically as ever:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...al-relativity/
Ethan Siegel: "Galileo had stated, back in the early 1600s, that there's no absolute and constant state of rest; no one observer would have a 'privileged' position. But it was also discovered that the speed of light was constant, no matter who the observer was or how they were moving. These two ideas might seem compatible, but Newton's laws of motion couldn't fit them together. It took a new view of the Universe, and Einstein's relativity, to make it work. [...] Albert A. Michelson constructed a series of ultra-sensitive interferometers set up to exploit exactly this fact. As the interferometer rotated into, perpendicular to, and against the Earth's direction of motion, there should have been shifts in the interference pattern produced by the beams of light as they moved through space. But no shift was ever observed; this experiment returned a null result. This was perhaps the most important null result in the history of physics, since it meant that the speed of light was constant to any and all observers."

Ethan Siegel, the Great Teacher in Einstein schizophrenic world:

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithab...se-443x590.jpg

Pentcho Valev