A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Simplest Experimental Falsification of Einstein's Relativity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 25th 16, 11:15 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default The Simplest Experimental Falsification of Einstein's Relativity

A simple experimental falsification of Einstein's general relativity. Consider the following two hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1: The speed of light falling towards the source of gravity varies like the speed of ordinary falling bodies (in the gravitational field of the Earth the acceleration of falling photons is g). Accordingly, the Pound-Rebka experiment confirms Newton's emission theory of light and refutes Einstein's relativity:

http://www.wfu.edu/~brehme/space.htm
Professor Robert W. Brehme: "Light falls in a gravitational field just as do material objects."

http://courses.physics.illinois.edu/...ctures/l13.pdf
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction."

http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...t_white_dwarfs
Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. (...) The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..."

Hypothesis 2: The speed of light falling towards the source of gravity DECREASES (in the gravitational field of the Earth the acceleration of falling photons is NEGATIVE, -2g). Accordingly, the Pound-Rebka experiment confirms Einstein's relativity and refutes Newton's emission theory of light.

Clearly, Hypothesis 2 is absurd. The acceleration "-2g" was a fudge factor Einstein and his mathematical friends had to introduce in order to make the "theory" compatible with gravitational time dilation, a miraculous effect Einstein had fabricated in 1911.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANOTHER SIMPLEST DISPROOF OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 31st 15 11:42 AM
THE SIMPLEST REFUTATION OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 August 11th 13 05:45 PM
EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 31 September 30th 10 08:21 AM
EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 12th 08 10:06 AM
EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 July 10th 08 09:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.