Another "Pole Shift" Chicken Little surfaces

Wally Anglesea wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...


Tom McDonald wrote:

spam this wrote:


"Double-A" wrote in message
le.com...


Wally Anglesea? wrote in


message . ..
. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar


wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.




So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could

just

inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the

polar

shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.


AFAIK, when the shift is over, it's basically end for end. However,
in the run-up, there are weird magnetic anomalies that spring up at odd
places. Or probably not so odd, just related to geology that I'm not up
on.

IIRC, there was a magnetic anomaly forming in the eastern Atlantic
near Africa; but I'm really open to correction on this.

Tom McDonald

What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen


What if you are just another in a long line of deliberately stupid kooks?
I think that's the most likely explanation.
HTH
**** you too.

"Yoda" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...
There is no interest here in researching or discussing a polar shift.
Most of the morons seem to think that ice core samples and polar
wanderings are something to laugh about. So I am through with
discussing anything concerning the soon to be polar reversal and
subseqent mantle spiral with anyone. There is no sobriety here, only
stupidity and fools.

Only when you show up.

"Yoda" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...
There is no interest here in researching or discussing a polar shift.
Most of the morons seem to think that ice core samples and polar
wanderings are something to laugh about. So I am through with
discussing anything concerning the soon to be polar reversal and
subseqent mantle spiral with anyone. There is no sobriety here, only
stupidity and fools.

Only when you show up.

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...


Dr_Postman wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda
wrote:



DrPostman wrote:


On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:




What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.


That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html

My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
Perhaps you should get some new glasses.


They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
they can get what they need to try to clone them.

You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
everything?

You accept whack theories as fact and you expect to be taken seriously?






Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to
a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the


Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.

I am not the one confused here, it is you.


No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.


The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.

Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha


And you have alternate actual evidence?








mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new
stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core
releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?


Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.

You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
at the evidence which already does exist.


You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
"evidence"

What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
Hhahahahahahaha

and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
following?
http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm

You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.





On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.

You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.


You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.

Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.

Educate yourself:

While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
you look bad.

http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...iles/frame.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html




How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?


There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.

You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.


Where is your proof that there are?


Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
like to pick fights dont you.


I saw the Hancock show, he
pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
I missed it in all the pics.)




As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,

What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.


What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.

It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
"research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.




with

wave action proving how they were formed.

There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
your incredible (sic) research?


How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.


Sure thing, asshole:

"The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Hancock's film
company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
(see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
Japanese domestic television."
source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/artic...?sid=36&page=1

**** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot.

What you meant to say was you don't like scholars who show your favorutie
fantasy is a load of hogwash in less than a minute.

That's usually the way with kooks.

Face it, your big lie got exposed. Everything else you present is just
nitpicking

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...


Dr_Postman wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda
wrote:



DrPostman wrote:


On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:




What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.


That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html

My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
Perhaps you should get some new glasses.


They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
they can get what they need to try to clone them.

You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
everything?

You accept whack theories as fact and you expect to be taken seriously?






Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to
a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the


Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.

I am not the one confused here, it is you.


No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.


The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.

Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha


And you have alternate actual evidence?








mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new
stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core
releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?


Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.

You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
at the evidence which already does exist.


You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
"evidence"

What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
Hhahahahahahaha

and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
following?
http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm

You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.





On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.

You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.


You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.

Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.

Educate yourself:

While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
you look bad.

http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...iles/frame.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html




How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?


There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.

You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.


Where is your proof that there are?


Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
like to pick fights dont you.


I saw the Hancock show, he
pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
I missed it in all the pics.)




As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,

What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.


What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.

It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
"research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.




with

wave action proving how they were formed.

There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
your incredible (sic) research?


How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.


Sure thing, asshole:

"The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Hancock's film
company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
(see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
Japanese domestic television."
source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/artic...?sid=36&page=1

**** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot.

What you meant to say was you don't like scholars who show your favorutie
fantasy is a load of hogwash in less than a minute.

That's usually the way with kooks.

Face it, your big lie got exposed. Everything else you present is just
nitpicking

"Yoda" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...
There is no interest here in researching or discussing a polar shift.

Right... these are "astronomy" newgroups, not geology newsgroups.

Most of the morons seem to think that ice core samples and polar
wanderings are something to laugh about. So I am through with
discussing anything concerning the soon to be polar reversal and
subseqent mantle spiral with anyone.

That would be "alleged" soon to be polar reversal and "alleged" subseqent
(sic) mantle spiral, as you have provided no evidence to support those
asstertions.

There is no sobriety here, only stupidity and fools.

Spouting ad hominem attacks doesn't make you right... it only reinforces the
point that you have no evidence.

"Yoda" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...
There is no interest here in researching or discussing a polar shift.

Right... these are "astronomy" newgroups, not geology newsgroups.

Most of the morons seem to think that ice core samples and polar
wanderings are something to laugh about. So I am through with
discussing anything concerning the soon to be polar reversal and
subseqent mantle spiral with anyone.

That would be "alleged" soon to be polar reversal and "alleged" subseqent
(sic) mantle spiral, as you have provided no evidence to support those
asstertions.

There is no sobriety here, only stupidity and fools.

Spouting ad hominem attacks doesn't make you right... it only reinforces the
point that you have no evidence.

Face it Wally, go back to the other newsgroups where you post bull****
all over the place and stick to what you do best..bull****.

Wally Anglesea wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...


Dr_Postman wrote:


On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda
wrote:



DrPostman wrote:



On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:





What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.


That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html

My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
Perhaps you should get some new glasses.


They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
they can get what they need to try to clone them.

You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
everything?


You accept whack theories as fact and you expect to be taken seriously?





Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to

a

cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the


Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.

I am not the one confused here, it is you.


No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.


The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.

Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha



And you have alternate actual evidence?







mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new

stellar

alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core

releasing

massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?


Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.

You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
at the evidence which already does exist.


You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
"evidence"

What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
Hhahahahahahaha


and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
following?
http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm

You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.





On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.

You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.


You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.

Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.


Educate yourself:

While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
you look bad.


http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...iles/frame.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html





How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?


There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.

You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.


Where is your proof that there are?


Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
like to pick fights dont you.


I saw the Hancock show, he

pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
I missed it in all the pics.)





As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,

What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.


What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.

It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
"research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.




with


wave action proving how they were formed.

There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
your incredible (sic) research?


How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.


Sure thing, asshole:

"The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Hancock's film
company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
(see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
Japanese domestic television."
source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/artic...?sid=36&page=1

**** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot.


What you meant to say was you don't like scholars who show your favorutie
fantasy is a load of hogwash in less than a minute.

That's usually the way with kooks.

Face it, your big lie got exposed. Everything else you present is just
nitpicking

Face it Wally, go back to the other newsgroups where you post bull****
all over the place and stick to what you do best..bull****.

Wally Anglesea wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...


Dr_Postman wrote:


On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:19:18 GMT, Yoda
wrote:



DrPostman wrote:



On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:





What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.


That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html

My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
Perhaps you should get some new glasses.


They weren't "near perfectly preserved" either. They don't even think
they can get what they need to try to clone them.

You read about one (1) Mammoth discovery and now you think you know
everything?


You accept whack theories as fact and you expect to be taken seriously?





Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to

a

cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the


Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.

I am not the one confused here, it is you.


No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.


The flipping of the magnetic fields will take several decades, if not
centuries. This will cause no earthquakes. The two are not related.

Says who? You.....hahahahahahaha



And you have alternate actual evidence?







mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new

stellar

alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core

releasing

massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?


Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.

You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
at the evidence which already does exist.


You are making some silly assumptions. I have looked at the
"evidence"

What evidence did you look at? A silly attempt to clone Mammoths?
Hhahahahahahaha


and found it wanting, if not out right wrong. Care to refute the
following?
http://www.planet-x.150m.com/nopoleshift.html
http://www.pibburns.com/smmia5.htm

You call those two web sites evidence? And then you have the nerve to
say I support those web sites? Man you are a dumb ass.





On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.

You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.


You are confused over what ice core samples can prove.

Pfftt...why dont you just go away or hide in a corner. Stop telling me
what I believe or do not believe. I can speak for myself. Idiot.


Educate yourself:

While you are at...do the same. ANd take that dunce cap off, it makes
you look bad.


http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...iles/frame.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icecores.html





How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?


There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.

You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.


Where is your proof that there are?


Like you care. You already stated there is no proof or evidence of
underwater structures... now you ask me where is the proof. You really
like to pick fights dont you.


I saw the Hancock show, he

pointed out no pyramids. The data from the museum in Cuba that
backed the last expedition doesn't show any pyramids either (unless
I missed it in all the pics.)





As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,

What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.


What I have researched seems to trump your ad hominems all to hell.

It actually shows how much of a dumb arse you are..your socalled
"research" isnt worth half of what my toilet paper is worth.




with


wave action proving how they were formed.

There is no wave action of water that produces perfectly horizontal and
vertical walls as yet in any scientific paper I have seen? Please show
me the quotes which scientists who claims water erosion can make
perfectly aligned vertical walls and horizontal steps? Please do show
your incredible (sic) research?


How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.


Sure thing, asshole:

"The Japanese sites of Yonaguni and Kerama are natural rock, with no
sign of archaeological significance. Again, I informed Hancock's film
company in June 2000 that these sites were natural, and that there
were better sites to visit. This information was ignored, although all
the documents and reports on better sites are in the public domain
(see bibliography, below). The Japanese Nippon TV company showed me
video recordings of the Yonaguni site in about 1992 and I considered
it to obviously be natural rock, an opinion that was reported on
Japanese domestic television."
source: http://www.hallofmaat.com/maat/artic...?sid=36&page=1

**** man, that web site right from the start proves its hostility to
anything supernatural, yet with Egyptian artwork to boot.


What you meant to say was you don't like scholars who show your favorutie
fantasy is a load of hogwash in less than a minute.

That's usually the way with kooks.

Face it, your big lie got exposed. Everything else you present is just
nitpicking

Paul Lawler wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...

There is no interest here in researching or discussing a polar shift.


Right... these are "astronomy" newgroups, not geology newsgroups.


Most of the morons seem to think that ice core samples and polar
wanderings are something to laugh about. So I am through with
discussing anything concerning the soon to be polar reversal and
subseqent mantle spiral with anyone.


That would be "alleged" soon to be polar reversal and "alleged" subseqent
(sic) mantle spiral, as you have provided no evidence to support those
asstertions.

This is a polar shift thread, You are asking for evidence..there is
already tons of evidence for polar reversals. Dumb ass.



There is no sobriety here, only stupidity and fools.


Spouting ad hominem attacks doesn't make you right... it only reinforces the
point that you have no evidence.

Again there is already ample evidence for polar reversals. Dumb arse.