Another "Pole Shift" Chicken Little surfaces

Thank you for that Double A

I was wondering what would happen in a reversal. Now i know!

Martin A
(sorry for top posting)



"Scientifically"? Bull crap!

The directional polarity of the magnetic field has nothing to do with
the direction of the Earth's rotation. The Sun reversed its
north/south polarity in 2001, and does so about every 22 years, yet
its direction of rotation stays the same.

The Earth does not do so with such clockwork. In fact we are about
500,000 years overdue for a pole reversal. The Earth's magnetic field
has been growing weaker for at least the last 100 years (some studies
indicate for much longer than that), so we could indeed be moving
towards a reversal, but there's no way you can predict any definite
year.

In fact, geologic evidence suggests that the process has sometimes
taken as long as 100 years to complete. During that time you might
have multiple poles wandering over various parts of the world. The
main danger would be from increased radiation from solar wind. Not
only would we not have the normal magnetic lines of force shielding
us, but the lines that existed could focus the radiation in unwanted
areas. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar
wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.

How bad would this be? Right now the magnetic lines of force guide
solar radiation to the north and south poles. People living at the
South Polar Station are exposed to this radiation, but presumably they
are aware of the risk. The effect on populated areas being hit by
this radiation would be a statistical increase in the cancer rate, but
that would be about it.

Some have theorized that periods of increased radiation have given
evolution a boast in the past. Perhaps it will again. Along with all
the two headed, three armed babies being born due to genetic damage,
maybe a few will be born with bigger brains!

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
om...
Wally Anglesea? wrote in
message . ..
.. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar
wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.


So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.

chuck petterson
curious about all things larger than life

"Double-A" wrote in message
om...
Wally Anglesea? wrote in
message . ..
.. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar
wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.


So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.

chuck petterson
curious about all things larger than life

spam this wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
om...

Wally Anglesea? wrote in

message . ..
. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar

wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.



So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.

AFAIK, when the shift is over, it's basically end for end.
However, in the run-up, there are weird magnetic anomalies that
spring up at odd places. Or probably not so odd, just related
to geology that I'm not up on.

IIRC, there was a magnetic anomaly forming in the eastern
Atlantic near Africa; but I'm really open to correction on this.

Tom McDonald

spam this wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
om...

Wally Anglesea? wrote in

message . ..
. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar

wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.



So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.

AFAIK, when the shift is over, it's basically end for end.
However, in the run-up, there are weird magnetic anomalies that
spring up at odd places. Or probably not so odd, just related
to geology that I'm not up on.

IIRC, there was a magnetic anomaly forming in the eastern
Atlantic near Africa; but I'm really open to correction on this.

Tom McDonald

Tom McDonald wrote:
spam this wrote:

"Double-A" wrote in message
om...

Wally Anglesea? wrote in


message . ..
. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar

wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.




So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.


AFAIK, when the shift is over, it's basically end for end. However,
in the run-up, there are weird magnetic anomalies that spring up at odd
places. Or probably not so odd, just related to geology that I'm not up
on.

IIRC, there was a magnetic anomaly forming in the eastern Atlantic
near Africa; but I'm really open to correction on this.

Tom McDonald

What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.

Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the
mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?

How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence...clonezone.html

www.teamatlantis.com

Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
found in the Meditteraean and other areas?

Tom McDonald wrote:
spam this wrote:

"Double-A" wrote in message
om...

Wally Anglesea? wrote in


message . ..
. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar

wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New
York.




So, there is the possibility of REALLY GOOD NEWS. Now, if we could just
inch it down between Baltimore and Richmond.........

But seriously folks, doesn't the geological data indicate that the polar
shift is an end for end swap? For the same reason I don't know why the
shhift would be random, I don't know why it would not be end for end.


AFAIK, when the shift is over, it's basically end for end. However,
in the run-up, there are weird magnetic anomalies that spring up at odd
places. Or probably not so odd, just related to geology that I'm not up
on.

IIRC, there was a magnetic anomaly forming in the eastern Atlantic
near Africa; but I'm really open to correction on this.

Tom McDonald

What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.

Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the
mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?

How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence...clonezone.html

www.teamatlantis.com

Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
found in the Meditteraean and other areas?

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:


What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.

That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html


Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the

Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.


mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?

Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.
On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.


How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?

There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.
As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface, with
wave action proving how they were formed. Even the TV show
were Hancock tries to prove they are man made the geologist
with him says otherwise. The claim for Cuba is even more silly.
So far all they have done is find rocks that might be man
made, but a LOT of closer investigation is needed before
any conclusion can be reached.
http://www.cuba.cu/ciencia/citma/ama/museo/exmari.htm


http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence...clonezone.html

That article is about trying to clone extinct animals (and btw, it
concludes that it will be impossible).



www.teamatlantis.com

Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
found in the Meditteraean and other areas?

Sure, you can add them, but you'd better be ready to support
weird theories with exceptional evidence.




--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
- Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:


What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.

That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html


Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the

Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.


mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?

Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.
On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.


How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?

There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.
As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface, with
wave action proving how they were formed. Even the TV show
were Hancock tries to prove they are man made the geologist
with him says otherwise. The claim for Cuba is even more silly.
So far all they have done is find rocks that might be man
made, but a LOT of closer investigation is needed before
any conclusion can be reached.
http://www.cuba.cu/ciencia/citma/ama/museo/exmari.htm


http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence...clonezone.html

That article is about trying to clone extinct animals (and btw, it
concludes that it will be impossible).



www.teamatlantis.com

Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
found in the Meditteraean and other areas?

Sure, you can add them, but you'd better be ready to support
weird theories with exceptional evidence.




--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
- Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.

DrPostman wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:53 GMT, Yoda
wrote:



What if the current height of Manchu Picchu in Peru as well as frozen
wooly Mammoths found in Siberia is evidence of a previous so called
polar shift? I have heard it said that Manchu Picchu was heaved up
during the last shift, and that only a massive "heat sink" can account
for the near perfectly preserved Mammoth discovered frozen.


That's a total myth. None have been found "perfectly preserved".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mom/atlantis.html
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html

My my aren't we nitpicking. What I said was, near perfectly preserved.
Perhaps you should get some new glasses.



Also wouldn't the tectonic plates all over the world begin to shift or
slide as the magnetic grid begins to loosen leading up to and prior to a
cataclysmic polar reversal? Perhaps there is a cubic function to the


Somehow you are confusing magnetic reversals for the movement
of plates.

No, you are confusing magnetic reversals for tectonic plate movements.
I already know that magnetic forces can and will affect the mantle of
the earth and the tectonic plates producing earthquakes worldwide. No
land region will go unaffected by earthquakes when the reversal happens.





mantle of the earth and if predictions are accurate, worldwide
earthquakes will occur like the ringing of a crystal with many facets,
and increasingly grow in magnatude until a critical threshold is
reached, whereupon the potential magnetic torque is released from the
polar areas causing the earth's mantle to slide into a whole new stellar
alignment. Such an instanteneous collapse of the earth's core releasing
massive tons of magnetic torque forces upon the mantle should not be
confused with mere polar "wanderings" yes?


Yea, because crustal displacement like that doesn't happen.

You don't have sufficient evidence to say that, and you haven't looked
at the evidence which already does exist.


On top of that we have ice cores that go back over 700,000
years indicating that no crustal displacement has happened
in that time, unlike what many woo woos claim.

You are confusing crustal displacement with ice core samples.




How else other than "instanteneous" polar reversal, where by extreme
pressures cause near next to or instant collapse or "heat" sinking in
some areas and rising in others, could we explain or account for
perfectly preserved (and engineered level tested) or horizontal
artifical structures and ancient masive pyramidal platforms existing
under water off the coast of Japan and Cuba?


There were no pyramidal shapes found at all in either location.

You are either really stupid, or just plain ignorant.

As for the location in Japan, what you don't get told by the woo woo
web sites is that there are similar structures at the surface,

What you get told is what they want you to know. What you choose to
agree with depends on your sanity factor I guess. In your case, I
wouldn't be holding out the sanity award.

with
wave action proving how they were formed.

How utterly despicable of you to write that. There is no such proof
that you suggest, if so provide the links please, otherwise I hear the
nurse is waiting for you outside your padded room.

Even the TV show
were Hancock tries to prove they are man made the geologist
with him says otherwise.

Just like you I suppose, you can prove that there is no such thing as
sunken artifical cities.

The claim for Cuba is even more silly.

Thats why National Geographic is doing a report on it, because of its
silly factor.

So far all they have done is find rocks that might be man
made, but a LOT of closer investigation is needed before
any conclusion can be reached.

Idiots always need "closer investigation" in order to see their own arse.

http://www.cuba.cu/ciencia/citma/ama/museo/exmari.htm



http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence...clonezone.html


That article is about trying to clone extinct animals (and btw, it
concludes that it will be impossible).

Duh!




www.teamatlantis.com

Might we add the recent discoveries of sunken structures and cities
found in the Meditteraean and other areas?


Sure, you can add them, but you'd better be ready to support
weird theories with exceptional evidence.

Its you who has the weird theory....er weirder response. Go back and
look at the evidence before you open your stupid arse mouth for all to see.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, And Stupid TOO, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-Dumb-Ass, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
- Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.