![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one is hilarious from the get-go.
Check out this *Opening* comment: "2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. " It's downhill from there. http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php -- Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult: http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... This one is hilarious from the get-go. Check out this *Opening* comment: "2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. " It's downhill from there. http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php snip Fun site. I'd like to know how he came across these manuscripts if everything was destroyed "into nothingness" during the last shift. BV. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... This one is hilarious from the get-go. Check out this *Opening* comment: "2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. " It's downhill from there. http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php snip Fun site. I'd like to know how he came across these manuscripts if everything was destroyed "into nothingness" during the last shift. BV. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php "The earth will be subjected to total destruction. It will be many times worse than my description. [...] without hope of a quick recovery, because all knowledge and resources will have been completely destroyed. [...] And it is in this scenario you will have to try to survive." If it's going to be "total destruction", who's going to survive? - L -- Larry Huntley Beaverton, Oregon Skep-Ti-Cult® Member #130-978649-969 http://www.skepticult.org/ "Skepticult subculture -- the dark underbelly of Usenet" (Jade_Dragon) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Thomas Edison inventor of direct currant" - Flagship1 of the Paranormal, 9 Sep 2003 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php "The earth will be subjected to total destruction. It will be many times worse than my description. [...] without hope of a quick recovery, because all knowledge and resources will have been completely destroyed. [...] And it is in this scenario you will have to try to survive." If it's going to be "total destruction", who's going to survive? - L -- Larry Huntley Beaverton, Oregon Skep-Ti-Cult® Member #130-978649-969 http://www.skepticult.org/ "Skepticult subculture -- the dark underbelly of Usenet" (Jade_Dragon) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Thomas Edison inventor of direct currant" - Flagship1 of the Paranormal, 9 Sep 2003 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... This one is hilarious from the get-go. I thought it was wonderful how you get the "I love Sunspot Holidays" adverts down the left hand side whilst the main panel is explaining how the sunspot cycle is leading to our inevitable destruction. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wally AngleseaT" wrote in message ... This one is hilarious from the get-go. I thought it was wonderful how you get the "I love Sunspot Holidays" adverts down the left hand side whilst the main panel is explaining how the sunspot cycle is leading to our inevitable destruction. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wally Anglesea? wrote in message . ..
This one is hilarious from the get-go. Check out this *Opening* comment: "2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. " It's downhill from there. http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php "Scientifically"? Bull crap! The directional polarity of the magnetic field has nothing to do with the direction of the Earth's rotation. The Sun reversed its north/south polarity in 2001, and does so about every 22 years, yet its direction of rotation stays the same. The Earth does not do so with such clockwork. In fact we are about 500,000 years overdue for a pole reversal. The Earth's magnetic field has been growing weaker for at least the last 100 years (some studies indicate for much longer than that), so we could indeed be moving towards a reversal, but there's no way you can predict any definite year. In fact, geologic evidence suggests that the process has sometimes taken as long as 100 years to complete. During that time you might have multiple poles wandering over various parts of the world. The main danger would be from increased radiation from solar wind. Not only would we not have the normal magnetic lines of force shielding us, but the lines that existed could focus the radiation in unwanted areas. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New York. How bad would this be? Right now the magnetic lines of force guide solar radiation to the north and south poles. People living at the South Polar Station are exposed to this radiation, but presumably they are aware of the risk. The effect on populated areas being hit by this radiation would be a statistical increase in the cancer rate, but that would be about it. Some have theorized that periods of increased radiation have given evolution a boast in the past. Perhaps it will again. Along with all the two headed, three armed babies being born due to genetic damage, maybe a few will be born with bigger brains! Double-A |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wally Anglesea? wrote in message . ..
This one is hilarious from the get-go. Check out this *Opening* comment: "2012 the next polar reversal will take place on earth. This means that the North Pole will be changed into the South Pole. Scientifically this can only be explained by the fact that the earth will start rotating in the opposite direction, together with a huge disaster of unknown proportions. " It's downhill from there. http://www.survive2012.com/geryl1.php "Scientifically"? Bull crap! The directional polarity of the magnetic field has nothing to do with the direction of the Earth's rotation. The Sun reversed its north/south polarity in 2001, and does so about every 22 years, yet its direction of rotation stays the same. The Earth does not do so with such clockwork. In fact we are about 500,000 years overdue for a pole reversal. The Earth's magnetic field has been growing weaker for at least the last 100 years (some studies indicate for much longer than that), so we could indeed be moving towards a reversal, but there's no way you can predict any definite year. In fact, geologic evidence suggests that the process has sometimes taken as long as 100 years to complete. During that time you might have multiple poles wandering over various parts of the world. The main danger would be from increased radiation from solar wind. Not only would we not have the normal magnetic lines of force shielding us, but the lines that existed could focus the radiation in unwanted areas. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New York. How bad would this be? Right now the magnetic lines of force guide solar radiation to the north and south poles. People living at the South Polar Station are exposed to this radiation, but presumably they are aware of the risk. The effect on populated areas being hit by this radiation would be a statistical increase in the cancer rate, but that would be about it. Some have theorized that periods of increased radiation have given evolution a boast in the past. Perhaps it will again. Along with all the two headed, three armed babies being born due to genetic damage, maybe a few will be born with bigger brains! Double-A |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for that Double A
I was wondering what would happen in a reversal. Now i know! Martin A (sorry for top posting) "Scientifically"? Bull crap! The directional polarity of the magnetic field has nothing to do with the direction of the Earth's rotation. The Sun reversed its north/south polarity in 2001, and does so about every 22 years, yet its direction of rotation stays the same. The Earth does not do so with such clockwork. In fact we are about 500,000 years overdue for a pole reversal. The Earth's magnetic field has been growing weaker for at least the last 100 years (some studies indicate for much longer than that), so we could indeed be moving towards a reversal, but there's no way you can predict any definite year. In fact, geologic evidence suggests that the process has sometimes taken as long as 100 years to complete. During that time you might have multiple poles wandering over various parts of the world. The main danger would be from increased radiation from solar wind. Not only would we not have the normal magnetic lines of force shielding us, but the lines that existed could focus the radiation in unwanted areas. For instance if a north pole formed over New York City, solar wind radiation would be funneled right down onto the people of New York. How bad would this be? Right now the magnetic lines of force guide solar radiation to the north and south poles. People living at the South Polar Station are exposed to this radiation, but presumably they are aware of the risk. The effect on populated areas being hit by this radiation would be a statistical increase in the cancer rate, but that would be about it. Some have theorized that periods of increased radiation have given evolution a boast in the past. Perhaps it will again. Along with all the two headed, three armed babies being born due to genetic damage, maybe a few will be born with bigger brains! Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Irregular angular rock surfaces at Spirit site | MarsFossils | Astronomy Misc | 12 | March 25th 04 10:27 PM |
Increasing Static Electricity Linked To Pole Shift? | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 22nd 04 11:36 PM |
Tumbleweed Rover Goes on a Roll at South Pole | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 4th 04 01:25 AM |
Little Red Riding Hood asks Grey Wolf | greywolf42 | Astronomy Misc | 13 | August 30th 03 10:23 PM |
TV REVIEW: 'COLUMBIA: FINAL MISSION'- Unheeded Concerns and the Columbia Disaster | Lynndel Humphreys | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 01:50 PM |