![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/04/2014 9:32 PM, dlzc wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 2014 6:06:54 AM UTC-7, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 04/04/2014 10:29 AM, dlzc wrote: ... Every equation says that time starts to slow down the closer you get to the event horizon, and it completely stops at the event horizon. No, you are looking at the wrong formulae. We are talking about falling in. I am talking about falling in too. ... But it's people on the outside looking at them falling in, that will see time slowdown. That is a problem with the light climbing out, not the stuff falling in. No time stoppage, cross the event horizon in finite exterior time. The speed of light is also the speed of time. To external viewers, it looks like the spaceship has stopped in mid-air, because our direction of time is no longer really used to measure its progress anymore. No you are wasting effort on the light climbing out, rather than sticking with the bits that fall in. Time and lightspeed are inextricably linked. This is as Einstein says, are you now disagreeing with Einstein? This has nothing to do with Einstein's Relativity. It has to do with QED, and the quantum vacuum energy. Relativity has nothing to say one way or another about whether gravity is a force or energy, Yes, it does. it just looks at its effects without any context. False. But what lies beneath Relativity is a different domain. One not subject to experimental falsification, and of no interest to me. "Reality" like "Truth" is something Nature does not show us. This is the area of full experimental falsification, it's called the Standard Model! I'm talking about our container universe. From the outside, we'd be seeing the container universe shrinking through Hawking Radiation. No, since every bit of matter that ever entered the black hole, always enters at the Big Bang event. Time zero. For all observers. No, only for observers inside the blackhole. Observers outside the blackhole will see objects falling into the blackhole at different various times. Observers inside the blackhole will always think that it all came in at exactly the same time, i.e. at the very beginning. But how would we detect the Hawking radiation from within the blackhole? I say as ZPE, but you did not like that. We'd likely see that the borders of the event horizon are shrinking too, and backward in time. Nope. Crossing the event horizon is always time zero, for all interior observers. But that's not what we're talking about, we're talking about Hawking radiation, which is objects leaving the blackhole. That's always going to be at the end of the universe. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Universe's biggest blackhole discovered inside a tiny dwarf galaxy! | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 14 | December 6th 12 08:08 PM |
The accelerating universe and what's wrong with it | John Polasek | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 10th 11 03:03 AM |
Valev right or wrong? - this is the wrong venue for this debate | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 29th 09 02:17 PM |
How can we 'see' a blackhole? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 43 | February 15th 07 09:13 AM |
why x-ray get out of blackhole? | Timothy Law | Misc | 8 | March 3rd 04 01:51 PM |