![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:22:57 AM UTC+2, Steve Willner wrote:
In article , Hannu Poropudas writes: Maybe the model of lensed-lambda-CDM theory is not the correct one? Maybe. I would try instead here some closed models (=oscillation models) of the Universe. Feel free. Let us know if you find one that fits the data. But why do you think closed models will change the lensing between the CMB and now? I'am not sure did I understood your question right. I think that our present Universe could be in phase of second cycle not in phase of the first. Reason for gravitational lensing I mentioned my earlier posting. Those Hanna-Maria's diamonds (not ordinary matter) and radiation could be main remains of the first cycle. Very rough picture of two phases of oscillation of the Universe (vertical is R-radius axis): * * * * * * ------------ time-axis Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas Finland |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Article: Inside inflation - after the big bang | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 3 | March 6th 07 11:04 PM |
Inflation? Help | kjakja | Research | 6 | February 9th 05 06:18 PM |
Big Bang Confirmed - Again | [email protected] | Misc | 110 | January 23rd 05 07:31 PM |
A possible explanation of "big bang" inflation | Zdenek Jizba | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 18th 04 12:20 PM |
The end of inflation | Charles Francis | Research | 0 | March 8th 04 07:58 PM |