A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LIGHT FALLS WITH TWICE THE ACCELERATION OF ORDINARY MATTER ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 13, 06:58 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGHT FALLS WITH TWICE THE ACCELERATION OF ORDINARY MATTER ?

http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/cla...elativity.html
Michael Fowler, University of Virginia: "What happens if we shine the pulse of light vertically down inside a freely falling elevator, from a laser in the center of the ceiling to a point in the center of the floor? Let us suppose the flash of light leaves the ceiling at the instant the elevator is released into free fall. If the elevator has height h, it takes time h/c to reach the floor. This means the floor is moving downwards at speed gh/c when the light hits. Question: Will an observer on the floor of the elevator see the light as Doppler shifted? The answer has to be no, because inside the elevator, by the Equivalence Principle, conditions are identical to those in an inertial frame with no fields present. There is nothing to change the frequency of the light. This implies, however, that to an outside observer, stationary in the earth's gravitational field, the frequency of the light will change. This is because he will agree with the elevator observer on what was the initial frequency f of the light as it left the laser in the ceiling (the elevator was at rest relative to the earth at that moment) so if the elevator operator maintains the light had the same frequency f as it hit the elevator floor, which is moving at gh/c relative to the earth at that instant, the earth observer will say the light has frequency f(1 + v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2), using the Doppler formula for very low speeds."

Substituting f=c/L (L is the wavelength) into Fowler's equation gives:

f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2) = (c+v)/L = c(1+gh/c^2)/L = c'/L

where f' is the frequency measured by both the observer "stationary in the earth's gravitational field" and an equivalent observer who, in gravitation-free space, moves with speed v=gh/c towards the emitter. Accordingly, c'=c+v=c(1+gh/c^2) is the speed of light relative to those two observers.. Clearly the frequency shift (measured in the Pound-Rebka experiment) confirms the variable speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light. This frequency shift is inconsistent with both the variable speed of light c'=c(1+2gh/c^2) predicted by Einstein's general relativity and the constant speed of light c'=c fiercely taught by Einsteinians all over the world.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TWIN PARADOX: DOES ACCELERATION MATTER? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 October 28th 12 11:50 AM
Want the solution to dark matter? Don't hold back, two dared to visitmy page in a year, it is here, maybe I just not the ordinary racist neighborin the UK Hitler camera world but have more interests in science than theaverage nazi [email protected] Astronomy Misc 10 September 29th 08 10:00 PM
First there was matter, much later there was light. Skybuck Flying Misc 0 April 29th 07 07:26 PM
Pioneer Acceleration Implies Light Speed Delay < 1 Second r9ns Astronomy Misc 8 November 19th 04 07:43 PM
P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate Ralph Sansbury Astronomy Misc 57 August 21st 04 10:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.