Soviet Mars 3 lander found?

Um, wasn't the topic for this thread concerning the probable identification of the Soviet Mars 3 lander fromn orbital pics?

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:19:25 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Um, wasn't the topic for this thread concerning the probable identification of the Soviet Mars 3 lander fromn orbital pics?

Welcome to the Usenet asylum. LOL

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:19:25 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Um, wasn't the topic for this thread concerning the probable identification of the Soviet Mars 3 lander fromn orbital pics?

Welcome to the Usenet asylum. LOL

Technically, someone should have changed the subject line when Bob
hijacked the thread with his usual "we should bring back all unmanned
space probes for display in museums" crap. But, considering how Usenet
News isn't what it used to be...

Jeff
--
"the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would
magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper
than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in
and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer

On Friday, May 3, 2013 6:27:55 AM UTC-5, Jeff Findley wrote:
Technically, someone should have changed the subject line when Bob
hijacked the thread with his usual "we should bring back all unmanned
space probes for display in museums" crap. But, considering how Usenet
News isn't what it used to be...

....Actually, the proper response would have been not to respond to his babble, but to have tossed his herpes-ridden ass into Killfile Hell and let him argue with himself.

....That being said, I found the use of "terminal retrorocket" instead of "crasher stage" rather interesting

OM

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 8:02:55 AM UTC-5, Dean wrote:
And you wonder why people compare you to Chicken Little

....You misspelled "****", Dean.

OM