A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

constellation question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 21st 04, 02:24 AM
Laura
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default constellation question


"Paul Schlyter" wrote in message
...
In article , Laura

wrote:
"Tim923" wrote in message
...
I assumed that stars in a constellation weren't actually close to each
other in space, that they only appeared close in our 2D viewing of
them, but I have a galaxy picture that would suggest otherwise.
Clarification?


Some will be closer to each other than others, but there is no rule that
they have to be close. Some are very close, such as the Pleiades,

because
that constellation is also a star cluster.
http://www.ras.ucalgary.ca/~gibson/pleiades/
In others, such as Orion, the distance of the individual stars varies a
great deal.

Naturally, the stars of all constellations will be within a certain

distance
from earth (but that distance is very large). The constallations were
defined long ago by viewing the stars with the naked eye, and none of

the
really distant and faint ones can be seen that way.


There's no requirement that a star has to be visible to the naked eye
to be situated in a constellation. Consider for instance Proxima
Centauri: it's magnitude 14 and thus far too faint to be visible to
the naked eye, yet it is situated in the constellation Centaurus.


True, but that's a fairly recent addition to the constellation - not made at
the time Centaurus was named and the imaginary shape of it plotted :-)
So, it follows that if none of the stars in a particular patch of sky are
visible to the naked eye, they were not made part of an original
constellation. That they were made part of already existing constellation
when they were detected I don't dispute, and that has nothing to do with the
point I was making :-)


In ancient times, constellations were defined by the constellation
figures, and the boundaries between the constellations were very
vaguely defined. There were even areas of the sky considered to not
belong to any constellation at all. In the 1700's this situation
started to change: stellar cartographists started to draw
constellation boundaries, and new constellations were invented to
fill in the areas of the sky having no constellation. And in 1930
the IAU defined the constellation boundaries rigorously. So today,
no matter what star you consider and no matter how faint, it belongs
to a constellation.


And most "Home-planetarium" type software can be set to show those
boundaries. They are laid out much like the borders of modern countries -
that is using a lot of right angles :-)

Occasionally, the proper motion of a star
carries it from one constellation to another.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? TKalbfus Policy 265 July 13th 04 12:00 AM
Moon key to space future? James White Policy 90 January 6th 04 04:29 PM
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) Lord Blacklight Astronomy Misc 56 November 21st 03 02:45 PM
Question about alignment & pointing north, level Mike Amateur Astronomy 8 September 7th 03 12:04 AM
PX question Bored Huge Krill Astronomy Misc 4 August 10th 03 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.