![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Schlyter" wrote in message ... In article , Laura wrote: "Tim923" wrote in message ... I assumed that stars in a constellation weren't actually close to each other in space, that they only appeared close in our 2D viewing of them, but I have a galaxy picture that would suggest otherwise. Clarification? Some will be closer to each other than others, but there is no rule that they have to be close. Some are very close, such as the Pleiades, because that constellation is also a star cluster. http://www.ras.ucalgary.ca/~gibson/pleiades/ In others, such as Orion, the distance of the individual stars varies a great deal. Naturally, the stars of all constellations will be within a certain distance from earth (but that distance is very large). The constallations were defined long ago by viewing the stars with the naked eye, and none of the really distant and faint ones can be seen that way. There's no requirement that a star has to be visible to the naked eye to be situated in a constellation. Consider for instance Proxima Centauri: it's magnitude 14 and thus far too faint to be visible to the naked eye, yet it is situated in the constellation Centaurus. True, but that's a fairly recent addition to the constellation - not made at the time Centaurus was named and the imaginary shape of it plotted :-) So, it follows that if none of the stars in a particular patch of sky are visible to the naked eye, they were not made part of an original constellation. That they were made part of already existing constellation when they were detected I don't dispute, and that has nothing to do with the point I was making :-) In ancient times, constellations were defined by the constellation figures, and the boundaries between the constellations were very vaguely defined. There were even areas of the sky considered to not belong to any constellation at all. In the 1700's this situation started to change: stellar cartographists started to draw constellation boundaries, and new constellations were invented to fill in the areas of the sky having no constellation. And in 1930 the IAU defined the constellation boundaries rigorously. So today, no matter what star you consider and no matter how faint, it belongs to a constellation. And most "Home-planetarium" type software can be set to show those boundaries. They are laid out much like the borders of modern countries - that is using a lot of right angles :-) Occasionally, the proper motion of a star carries it from one constellation to another. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Question about alignment & pointing north, level | Mike | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 7th 03 12:04 AM |
PX question | Bored Huge Krill | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 10th 03 02:54 AM |