![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why hasn't the light from the CMB already gone by
long ago, since it started out when the universe was a lot smaller? The various youtube lectures never answer that for me. All of it that remains ought to be long gone, going the other way, by now. We'd see its backside, if you could see backsides. -- On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Ron Hardin:
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:23:14 PM UTC-7, Ron Hardin wrote: Why hasn't the light from the CMB already gone by long ago, since it started out when the universe was a lot smaller? It was "trapped" at our Rindler horizon. The various youtube lectures never answer that for me. All of it that remains ought to be long gone, going the other way, by now. We'd see its backside, if you could see backsides. Always more salmon swimming up the stream... http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/photons_outrun.html .... just remember inflation was multiples of c, and our Rindler horizon (expansion rate at that distance = c) is inside the Universe. Light at that "surface" will take forever to get to us... assuming there is no acceleration of expansion. David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Op donderdag 6 juni 2013 21:23:14 UTC+2 schreef Ron Hardin het volgende:
Why hasn't the light from the CMB already gone by long ago, since it started out when the universe was a lot smaller? Have a look at: http://users.telenet.be/nicvroom/fri...20equation.htm You should consider the universe as a sphere and you are in the centre. Take a point almost at the rim of the sphere. Consider this point as an exploding star which emits light in all directions. This point will move outwards because the universe expands however also some light will move towards the center. Consider this light as a new point as an exploding star which emits light in all directions. The difference which this point and the first is that the expansion difference is less than the first. The result is that light from the second source (considering the same time interval) will move more towards the observer. However because the expanding speed is higher the point will move outwards. Repeat this many times. The overall result will be, because the light will move towards a region where the expansion speed is less that the expansion velocity becomes equal to the distance travelled towards the observer at the same time interval. At this moment the expansion speed is c. This is the horizontal part in the curve shown. After that instant the point starts to move towards the observer because the expansion speed is less than the distance travelled towards the observer. This is the blue line in figure 3 Hopes this helps Nicolaas Vroom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cosmic microwave background from diffusion? | Zanthius | Astronomy Misc | 19 | October 17th 08 09:37 PM |
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, | Scott Miller | Science | 9 | April 18th 06 04:19 AM |
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, | Scott Miller | Technology | 9 | April 18th 06 04:19 AM |
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (3) | Max Keon | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 23rd 05 02:54 PM |
Cosmic Microwave Background first used in print? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 7 | June 30th 05 11:43 PM |