Abuse of Scientific Methods

On Jun 7, 5:37 am, Absolutely Testicle wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of
scientific method?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw

Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds
all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat
is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. shrug

Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and
urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not
done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s
transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single
experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null
results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled
physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have
realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame
of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR.
shrug

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations

IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES.
Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its
antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. EFFECTIVELY,
SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. shrug

Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically
different. At some boundary within the domain of applicability,
predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet
explored by science. Self-styled physicists seem to be very
afraid of going there. shrug

Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental
results produced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already
acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable
given today’s technology. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae

If PD aka absolutely imbecile wants to deny the fact that so far
any experiments have not uniquely verified SR, that is entirely
its problem and its only.
Why does Tom not reply? Because he knows he has failed as a
professional experimental physicist, and Koobee Wublee won’t let him
get away with bull****. shrug

don't flatter yourself. sometimes what you say is pitiable enough that
it doesn't warrant more than a cursory reply and some people don't think
it's even worth that.

The self-styled physicists do not study. They stopped at the Lorentz
transform without understanding how it was derived in the first
place. In doing so, they mystically attributed this divine act of
miracle to their god aka Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar, and the works prior to their god’s presence was conveniently
forgotten. On the other hand, Koobee Wublee has gone beyond the
Lorentz transform and has studied on the previous manifestations of
this transform like a true scientist should have done in the first
place. Not knowing about the existence of the antitheses to SR, they
have bet their lives on the Lorentz transform. shrug

The so-called co-moderator of sci.physics.research realized
immediately that if the post were to be published over there, his
“great works” on particle physics would be greatly compromised. As
predicted, he is behaving like a priest from Ancient Nile delta
attempting to desperately maintain to his elite status quo. shrug

Eventually, SR will be trashcanned due to its stupidity, and the self-
styled physicists’ names will be dragged in mud. If that will happen
anyway, the self-styled physicists might as well milk the system as
much as they can until they are booted out. shrug

A few, like Tom, would cling on to a thread of hope believing that
someday experiments will validate only SR and not its antitheses. If
they actually do their own diligence and study like what Tom has
suggested all to do, they will realize SR is just full of mathematical
inconsistencies which Koobee Wublee has addressed each one many times
over in these newsgroups. The chance of salvation by a future
experiment is indeed a pipe dream. shrug

[rest of bitching nonsense snipped]

The subject is closed. Tom and the self-styled physicists cannot
defend their version of scientific method. They send a moron (PD
absolutely imbecile) to argue their cause. shrug

Is there any doubt that the Orwellian philosophy is well indoctrinated
among the self-styled physicists?

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NOISE IS COHERENCY
** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** WORSHIP IS STUDY
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
** CONSPIRACY IS PEER
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** CONTRADICTION IS INMATERIAL
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION

shrug