Chapt17 upper limit of ability to "see" in astronomy is 400 millionlight years distance #1592 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

In May 2010
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

(snipped)


--- from Wikipedia ---
classical electron radius, also known as the Lorentz radius or the
Thomson scattering length, is based on a classical (i.e., non-
quantum)
relativistic model of the electron. Its value is calculated as 2.8
x
10^-15 meters
--- end ---


So the diameter is x2 = 5.6 x 10^-15 meters


1 light year = 10^16 meters
400 million ly = 4 x 10^8
So I am looking at 4 x 10^24 meters


The probability of a hurdle in running from a random lattice is 6/
(pi^2).


That gives me reassurance that 400 million light years is too far of a
distance
if the Cosmic density of atoms is 1 atom per cubic meter.

Let me see if I can talk my way into an answer here. Or at least a
better
way of arriving at an answer that is intuitive.


Let me say that I was on a quasar that was 400 million light years
away from
Earth. And that the quasar shoots a beam of light towards
Earth. Let me say I was riding on one of those light-waves towards
Earth.


And to get to Earth as my final destination. I need to miss every one
of those
Intergalactic atoms whose diameter is 5.6 x 10^-15 meters. So
travelling in the
IGM, intergalactic medium, I have to worry about each lattice cell
that is a cubic
meter because inside each of those lattice cells resides a electron
diameter that
could end my travel to the Earth.


So that if the distance from this quasar to Earth is 400 million
light
years away,
means that I encounter 4 x 10^24 of these lattice cells and that
many
chances
of being blocked by the electron diameter inside each one of those
cells.


If I were a gambling man, this is not a trip I would bet success on.
The distance
involved of 4 x 10^24 meters, and the blocking involved of 5.6 x
10^-15 meters
per every cubic meter is not in my favor. Now if the density of the
IGM were in
the Electron Magnetic Moment of 9.28 x 10^-24 J/T then I would have
some chance
of making it through, or better yet the Proton Magnetic Moment of
1.41
x 10^-26 J/T.


But here in year 2013, I reckon the upper limit distance that light
can travel as 400 million light years is not due to a theory of being
blocked by traveling through space but rather is the incoherence of
light itself after traveling such a far distance. If all light were
laser light, it would travel further, but even so, laser light also
has a upper limit with distance traveled and it is this concept that
neither physicists nor astronomers have seriously looked into and
determined the upper limit. But I think this topic requires that
serious research due to the Ring found by Jarrett, because that ring
requires an explanation and the explanation I have for it is that it
is the upper limit and that is why we see a Ring.


Now according to Jarrett's website:


--- quoting ---
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/


The seventh layer (0.05 z 0.06) contains the backside of the
Shapley Concentration, while the Sculpter supercluster dominates the
southern hemisphere. The eighth and final layer (z 0.06) contains
the most distant structures that 2MASS resolves, including the
Pisces-
Cetus (located behind P-P), Bootes (located behind Hercules),
Horologium and Corona Borealis galaxy clusters. At these faint flux
levels, the photometric redshifts are losing their ability to
discern
the cosmic web beyond 300 Mpc, smearing and degrading the resolution
of the 3-D construct.
--- end quoting ---


He claims the photometric redshifts are too degraded beyond 300 Mpc
which is about
1 billion light years distance. Yet many reported distances are far
beyond 1 billion
light years such as the two supernova reported at 4 billion light
years or the
quasars routinely reported beyond 1 billion light years.


What I am argueing in this chapter is that the telescope itself, the
finest available
telescope cannot see beyond 400 million light years due to the
Cosmic
density
of atoms of about 1 atom per cubic meter of space. But more
important, that the laws of physics of light travel cannot keep light
waves coherent enough after 400 million light years of travel and have
all dissipated into scattered light so that we cannot see anything,
even the brightest supernova after 400 million light years of travel.
The light from a
quasar at
1 billion light years away is never able to form a image since every
one of its
photons will be blocked as it travels through space after 400
million
light years
distance. (This upper limit distance goes for radio telescopes also.)
But more important than blocking is the inherent behavior of light,
that it cannot stay together at that distance of travel.


Now probability theory is not what convinces most people that a idea
is true.
Some would hanker to say that the atom in each cubic meter lattice
cell are
all in one position which allows light to travel any distance
without
being
interfered or blocked.


But I would rejoinder with this arguement, that the Probability
theory, called
Orchard Visibility Problem and its related problems, make several
predictions
of note. One such prediction is that the Upper Limit of Viewing
results in a
RING structure. And we see this RING structure in Jarrett's third
layer.


Which to me would then mean that the mapping of the Cosmos by Jarrett
is no further than the 400 million light year distance and that all
the other
layers beyond the third lie within those first three layers. The
quasars and
Great Walls are actually much closer to Earth than what Jarrett's
mapping
conveys. If you can see a image of a distant object in the telescope
(radio
or otherwise) then it means the object is 400 million or less light
years away.


Now, another prediction of a Orchard Visible Problem is that at the
furthest
reaches of the Orchard, in the case of astronomy and Jarrett's
mapping, the
objects look all identical in terms of size and proportion and what
they are.
So at the end of the Orchard, we see all the trees of the same small
size
and forming that RING boundary.


Now do we see the same in Astronomy? Of course we do, for we see at
the
last layer almost nothing but quasars. Jarrett thinks they are
highly
energetic
fastly moving away from Earth with their redshift. I think they are
fastly moving
towards Earth with a refraction redshift, and are normal galaxies
much
closer
to Earth and are about 200 to 400 million light years away. They are
the ring
of orchard trees at the edge of visibility.


By 2013, I believe the upper limit of 400 million light years is due
more to the inherent behavior of light waves rather than the blocking
affect by particles in space. I suppose a physicist should first ask
the question of how much further a beam of light that is not laser can
travel compared to a beam of light of equal intensity that is a laser
light? So what is the answer? Can the laser light travel 2x as far as
the nonlaser light and still be seen? So once we have an answer to the
distance laser light can travel compared to nonlaser light, we can
begin to seriously have a physics upper limit to how far light can
travel in astronomy and still be "see-able" and I reckon this upper
limit is 400 million light years. So long as the astronomy community
hides behind their hideous and odious assumption that light emitted
from a star, quasar, galaxy travels forever and to infinity without
any upper limit, then astronomy is for kindergarten school scientists.


--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search archive from May 2012 to May 2013. Drexel
University's Math Forum has done a far better job and many of those
missing Google posts can be seen he

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies