![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The following article got me thinking about neutrino detectors. The
subject of the article itself is pretty fascinating in its own right, about super-high-energy neutrinos coming from cosmic sources. BBC News - Neutrinos from the cosmos hint at new era in astronomy http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22540352 As we know, when a neutrino strikes an atomic nucleus, it creates a bright flash of Cherenkov Radiation, which is then detected by these detectors. But my question is how much Cherenkov radiation will be detected? How bright is the Cherenkov, that a single measly neutrino striking a single measly atomic nucleus would produce enough photons to be able to see it through hundreds of feet of ice? Would a single event be energetic enough to produce the billions and trillions of Cherenkov photons needed to be detected separately at various detectors placed strategically around the ice? Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yousuf Khan wrote:
As we know, when a neutrino strikes an atomic nucleus, it creates a bright flash of Cherenkov Radiation, which is then detected by these detectors. But my question is how much Cherenkov radiation will be detected? How bright is the Cherenkov, that a single measly neutrino striking a single measly atomic nucleus would produce enough photons to be able to see it through hundreds of feet of ice? Would a single event be energetic enough to produce the billions and trillions of Cherenkov photons needed to be detected separately at various detectors placed strategically around the ice? A photomultiplier tube can detect a single photon. Hope this helps. Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/05/2013 9:56 AM, Steve Pope wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: As we know, when a neutrino strikes an atomic nucleus, it creates a bright flash of Cherenkov Radiation, which is then detected by these detectors. But my question is how much Cherenkov radiation will be detected? How bright is the Cherenkov, that a single measly neutrino striking a single measly atomic nucleus would produce enough photons to be able to see it through hundreds of feet of ice? Would a single event be energetic enough to produce the billions and trillions of Cherenkov photons needed to be detected separately at various detectors placed strategically around the ice? A photomultiplier tube can detect a single photon. Hope this helps. I understand, but how many photons are created by the single neutrino strike by itself? Is there somebody who knows? Yousuf Khan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Yousuf Khan wrote: On 16/05/2013 9:56 AM, Steve Pope wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: As we know, when a neutrino strikes an atomic nucleus, it creates a bright flash of Cherenkov Radiation, which is then detected by these detectors. But my question is how much Cherenkov radiation will be detected? How bright is the Cherenkov, that a single measly neutrino striking a single measly atomic nucleus would produce enough photons to be able to see it through hundreds of feet of ice? Would a single event be energetic enough to produce the billions and trillions of Cherenkov photons needed to be detected separately at various detectors placed strategically around the ice? A photomultiplier tube can detect a single photon. Hope this helps. I understand, but how many photons are created by the single neutrino strike by itself? Is there somebody who knows? It would depend on the energy of the neutrino and the medium that absorbs the energy. The initial impact doesn't produce photons AFAICT; rather, ionizing radiation from the nuclear reaction disturbs electrons in the ice molecules, which then emit photons. You could roughly estimate the number by dividing the impact energy by the energy of a UV photon, something like 50 eV. For a better result you'd have to integrate the frequency distribution of Cherenkov radiation, which is an odd one -- intensity proportional to frequency up to a cutoff (for water, in the near X-ray IIRC) where the index of refraction decreases to 1. Most of the radiated energy will come from the high-frequency photons, but it takes more low-frequency (visible) photons to contribute a given amount of energy. Anyway, supposing the energy a beta particle carries away from the nucleus to be in the MeV range, it should produce thousands of photons along its track. -- Odysseus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/05/2013 2:10 PM, Odysseus wrote:
It would depend on the energy of the neutrino and the medium that absorbs the energy. The initial impact doesn't produce photons AFAICT; rather, ionizing radiation from the nuclear reaction disturbs electrons in the ice molecules, which then emit photons. You could roughly estimate the number by dividing the impact energy by the energy of a UV photon, something like 50 eV. For a better result you'd have to integrate the frequency distribution of Cherenkov radiation, which is an odd one -- intensity proportional to frequency up to a cutoff (for water, in the near X-ray IIRC) where the index of refraction decreases to 1. Most of the radiated energy will come from the high-frequency photons, but it takes more low-frequency (visible) photons to contribute a given amount of energy. Anyway, supposing the energy a beta particle carries away from the nucleus to be in the MeV range, it should produce thousands of photons along its track. Okay thanks, that makes sense. Yousuf Khan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:10:10 -0600, Odysseus wrote:
... The initial impact doesn't produce photons AFAICT; rather, ionizing radiation from the nuclear reaction disturbs electrons in the ice molecules, which then emit photons.... ionizing radiation = high-energy photons |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Lofty Goat wrote: On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:10:10 -0600, Odysseus wrote: ... The initial impact doesn't produce photons AFAICT; rather, ionizing radiation from the nuclear reaction disturbs electrons in the ice molecules, which then emit photons.... ionizing radiation = high-energy photons Ionizing radiations includes not only gamma rays, but also nuclear fragments, electrons (beta radiation), positrons, and other charged species. The latter kind is what I was referring to. -- Odysseus |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/30/2013 9:41 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:10:10 -0600, Odysseus wrote: ... The initial impact doesn't produce photons AFAICT; rather, ionizing radiation from the nuclear reaction disturbs electrons in the ice molecules, which then emit photons.... ionizing radiation = high-energy photons actually, no. betas, alphas, and fission fragments are also ionizing radiation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Faster-than-Light Neutrino Puzzle Claimed Solved by Special Relativity | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 17th 11 01:06 PM |
CERN's faster-than-light neutrino report | Thad Floryan | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | October 1st 11 08:13 AM |
HOW TO PRODUCE LIGHT {Noor(Divine Energy)} IN YOUR HEART. | shariq mangrio | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 7th 09 05:59 PM |
MINOS experiment sheds light on mystery of neutrino disappearance(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 31st 06 06:17 AM |
MINOS experiment sheds light on mystery of neutrino disappearance(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | March 31st 06 05:44 AM |