![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apparently no physicist of the Standard Model is concerned about the
neutrino as a wave, otherwise the literature would not be dearth about what wave it is. Metaphorically, physicists claim they would know all about Europe, but when you ask them a question it is clear they know nothing about France; because they know all about a Higgs boson, yet nothing about the neutrino as wave. It is cases like this that you want and need to pack up every physicist and send him/her back to school for an intensive year of learning of logic, basic logic on how to think clearly. Ask a physicist whether the neutrino is a single transverse wave, a double transverse wave, or a longitudinal wave, or some other form of wave. Ask them. And then ask them why they believe in a Standard Model which says nothing about the neutrino wave, yet this same phony Standard Model has all types of features and properties for a alleged Higgs boson. Is it any wonder that the credibility of our modern day physicist is becoming that of a used car salesman, or a politician running for office. So, come on now, if the Standard Model is utterly deaf, dumb and silent about the neutrino wave, then the Standard Model is worthless trash and should never have even embarked on a silly notion of a Higgs boson. But that is the thing about modern day science. Where any half baked idea is touted to open up the government coffers of throwing away billions of dollars on crackpot physics. How many billions have already been wasted on the Higgs boson? Yet none of those physicists has ever outlined a neutrino wave. If the Standard Model is so inept at telling us anything about the neutrino as a wave, then the Standard Model is nothing but wastrel physics. Now the Maxwell Equations can at least start the questioning for they tell us that the neutrino wave moves through matter as if the matter was not there at all. This implies the neutrino cannot be a transverse wave because they do not penetrate matter that well. However, longitudinal waves such as sound waves are better in a dense medium such as solid matter. So if longitudinal, what would occupy the poles of a longitudinal wave. Since it has no electric charge, it must have just a magnetic poles and could it be a magnetic dipole for two poles? No, it would have to be two poles of magnetic monopoles, M- and M+ where the - stands for south pole and + stands for north. So, it is highly likely that neutrinos are longitudinal waves, and they would be composed of magnetic monopoles. -- Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill. Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand only legal names of subscribers which hugely prevents search engine bombing and hate spew. Drexel has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here : http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Titius Bode Rule is a Balmer Rydberg rule Chapt16.16 deriving BalmerRydberg from Maxwell Equations #1479 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 13 08:02 AM |
Titius-Bode Rule becomes a law of physics from Maxwell EquationsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1456 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 7 | April 4th 13 09:54 AM |
Chapt43 Superdeterminism only in an Atom Totality #447 Atom Totality4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 26th 11 07:27 PM |
Chapt19; Superdeterminism #223 Atom Totality theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 28th 09 04:38 AM |