A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism#1313 New Physics #1516 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 13, 06:20 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default neutrino longitudinal wave Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving DarwinEvolution & Superdeterminism #1321 New Physics #1524 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Apparently no physicist of the Standard Model is concerned about the
neutrino as a wave, otherwise the literature would not be dearth about
what wave it is.

Metaphorically, physicists claim they would know all about Europe, but
when you ask them a question it is clear they know nothing about
France; because they know all about a Higgs boson, yet nothing about
the neutrino as wave.

It is cases like this that you want and need to pack up every
physicist and send him/her back to school for an intensive year of
learning of logic, basic logic on how to think clearly.

Ask a physicist whether the neutrino is a single transverse wave, a
double transverse wave, or a longitudinal wave, or some other form of
wave.
Ask them. And then ask them why they believe in a Standard Model which
says nothing about the neutrino wave, yet this same phony Standard
Model has all types of features and properties for a alleged Higgs
boson.

Is it any wonder that the credibility of our modern day physicist is
becoming that of a used car salesman, or a politician running for
office.

So, come on now, if the Standard Model is utterly deaf, dumb and
silent about the neutrino wave, then the Standard Model is worthless
trash and should never have even embarked on a silly notion of a Higgs
boson.

But that is the thing about modern day science. Where any half baked
idea is touted to open up the government coffers of throwing away
billions of dollars on crackpot physics. How many billions have
already been wasted on the Higgs boson? Yet none of those physicists
has ever outlined a neutrino wave.

If the Standard Model is so inept at telling us anything about the
neutrino as a wave, then the Standard Model is nothing but wastrel
physics.

Now the Maxwell Equations can at least start the questioning for they
tell us that the neutrino wave moves through matter as if the matter
was not there at all. This implies the neutrino cannot be a transverse
wave because they do not penetrate matter that well. However,
longitudinal waves such as sound waves are better in a dense medium
such as solid matter. So if longitudinal, what would occupy the poles
of a longitudinal wave. Since it has no electric charge, it must have
just a magnetic poles and could it be a magnetic dipole for two poles?
No, it would have to be two poles of magnetic monopoles, M- and M+
where the - stands for south pole and + stands for north.

So, it is highly likely that neutrinos are longitudinal waves, and
they would be composed of magnetic monopoles.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand only legal names of
subscribers which hugely prevents search engine bombing and hate spew.
Drexel has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP
sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titius Bode Rule is a Balmer Rydberg rule Chapt16.16 deriving BalmerRydberg from Maxwell Equations #1479 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 9th 13 08:02 AM
Titius-Bode Rule becomes a law of physics from Maxwell EquationsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1456 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 7 April 4th 13 09:54 AM
Chapt43 Superdeterminism only in an Atom Totality #447 Atom Totality4th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 26th 11 07:27 PM
Chapt19; Superdeterminism #223 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 28th 09 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.