![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 7:19 pm, Hetware wrote:
http://www.speakeasy.org/~hattons/mtw/ They construct a small deviant quadrilateral from elements of two arbitrary vector fields u and v by first by displacing by u da and evaluating v db at the tip of u da. Then they displace by v db and evaluate u da at the tip of v db. That produces a quadrilateral that isn't quite closed. They close it with [v,u]da db. All good and well. Then they transport a vector A around the curve. "With the route now specified, the vector A is to be transported around it. One way to do this, "geometrical construction" by the method of Schild's ladder applied over and over, is the foundation for planning a possible experiment. For planning an abstract and coordinate-free calculation (the present line of action), introduce a "fiducial field," only to take it away at the end of the calculation. Plan: conceive of A, not as a localized vector, defined solely at the start of the trip, but as a vector field (defined throughout the trip). Purpose: To provide a standard of referenc (comparison of A transported from the origin with A at the place in question.)..." They then give a longish description of the steps which might be summarized as: delta A = A(u da)_;v db - A_;v db - A(v db)_;u da + A_;u da + A_;[v,u] da db where A on the rhs of this expression is the A field. Yes, all these parallel transport things came during the so-called golden age of GR where self-styled physicists were trying to create something that will finally make themselves to be the elitists of science just like the ancient Egyptian priests able to maintain their status quo as social elites among a bunch of working people. In reality, the self-styled physicists actually have not understood much, and the name of the game is image that is how the rest would think how smart the self-styled physicists are. It is truly fvcking pathetic. shrug A few years ago, Koobee Wublee was just like you combing through literatures about GR trying to understand the supposed to be the most complicated theoretical creation of mankind. After sensing bull**** after bull****, Koobee Wublee then decided to bypass the golden age of GR charade and examine the raw materials that came out of the founding fathers of differential geometry and then finally GR. Over there, you will understand the entire hypothesis crystal clear and the very reasons why some of the founding fathers decided to walk away from it. You will then realize the majority of the self-styled physicists do not even understand the crap they are worshipping. That, of course, included Wheeler who did not really have understood Weyl. When someone has hinted at you that he always finds something new rereading the same book decade after decade, that is a tell-tale sign of not understanding a single fvckig thing in the first place. Don’t be so fvcking gullible. shrug So, keep up with your quest. It depends on your intelligence. Some will see the crap earlier while some will be indulged in the cesspool of bull**** for quite some time before realizing they are swimming in crap, but most will succumb to peer pressures fantasizing about the Emperor’s non-existing clothes. If your id allows you to steer away from peer pressure, you can reach out to Koobee Wublee, and Koobee Wublee will be happy to give you better guidance in understanding GR according to the founding fathers of this great and fun-to-study hypothesis but at the end --- no cigar. shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice John Archibald Wheeler Quote | Knecht | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 23rd 09 05:39 PM |
Leading physicist John Wheeler dies at age 96 (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 08 12:12 AM |
Leading physicist John Wheeler dies at age 96 (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | April 17th 08 12:03 AM |
Hiley refutes Wheeler | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 3rd 07 05:39 AM |
s.a.a. Mugshots welcomes Phil Wheeler | Martin R. Howell | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 31st 06 12:38 AM |