![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 12:33*pm, JF Mezei wrote:
I know this is all in hindsight... NASA had wanted to go with electric hydraulics for some time. Boeing now has electric hydraulics on its commercial 787 plane. I realise that moving to electric also probably means beefing up the electric power supply for the shuttle. However, from the hydraulic systems point of view, could the 787 hydraulic pumps be used on the shuttle ? If NASA still has to design them from scratch due to harsher environment, would the Boeing experience with electric hydraulic make a significant difference in lowering the costs of this conversion ? Probably, although scaled up..... Its sad if the shuttle had LFBB and other upgrades probably model 2 it could till be flying today and a version used for heavy lift... part of the problem was not designing the shuttle or a version for unmanned or minimally manned... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If columbia hadnt been lost would the shuttle still be flying? | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 25 | February 23rd 13 06:01 PM |
New Book Hails Lost Columbia Shuttle Astronauts | Rob | Space Shuttle | 4 | February 28th 06 07:46 PM |
In Memory of Those Lost in Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 2 | May 30th 05 10:06 PM |
In Memory of Those Lost in Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia | [email protected] | History | 1 | May 30th 05 09:33 PM |
If we hadnt built shuttle, and stuck with apollo applications | Hallerb | History | 13 | September 10th 03 01:43 AM |