![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... To top this all off, I'm not even sure that what I pose as a "worst case scenario" truly is the "worst case scenario". Other failure modes might prove worse, depending on the details. This is why NASA and Bigelow Aerospace employ aerospace engineers, because this truly is "rocket science". A massive leak appears in the side, which puts a torque moment on the module which then rips out the CBM port on the station side leading to massive depressurization. Then the station tumbles out of control and lands on the next Soyuz waiting to be launched, destroying it and the pad and killing the crew and backup crew during a photo-op. (my stab at worst case.) Jeff -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One-man Explorer Modules | K. M. Kirby | Space Shuttle | 11 | February 22nd 07 12:43 PM |
How many more modules are to be added to ISS? | bob haller | Space Station | 13 | August 16th 04 04:48 AM |
ISS Modules without Shuttle? | Josh Gigantino | Policy | 10 | November 27th 03 05:30 AM |
Commercial ISS Modules? | BenignVanilla | Space Station | 7 | July 13th 03 03:33 PM |