A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Proof The Moon was Captured



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 23rd 12, 01:44 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. Think about the reasons TeBet
  #2  
Old October 23rd 12, 02:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 5:44*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. *Think about the reasons *TeBet


It also has extremely big and yet relatively shallow dents that didn't
manage to destroy it, indicating that it was a well formed and nicely
aged sphere of fused paramagnetic basalt prior to getting impacted, or
simply as having survived a glancing blow by something the size of an
icy Earth that needed an Arctic ocean basin and a seasonal tilt.

Captures via lithobraking seems to be offering a lot better
probability than our peers have been letting on.

At the very least, encountering such an icy planetoid that became our
moon would have caused massive global flooding, among other issues.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”

  #3  
Old October 23rd 12, 02:25 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 9:02*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 23, 5:44*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:

Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. *Think about the reasons *TeBet


It also has extremely big and yet relatively shallow dents that didn't
manage to destroy it, indicating that it was a well formed and nicely
aged sphere of fused paramagnetic basalt prior to getting impacted, or
simply as having survived a glancing blow by something the size of an
icy Earth that needed an Arctic ocean basin and a seasonal tilt.

Captures via lithobraking seems to be offering a lot better
probability than our peers have been letting on.

At the very least, encountering such an icy planetoid that became our
moon would have caused massive global flooding, among other issues.

*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”


Brad it shows imperial thinkers jump on a bad theory,and rather defend
it than admit they goofed. Sad but there are other bad theories that
they won't drop. TreBert
  #4  
Old October 23rd 12, 02:59 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default Proof The Moon was Captured


"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
...
Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. Think about the reasons TeBet



*** Here's a little something for idiots like yourself and that
other dumb-ass GuthBall ... what the hell, let's throw Painintheass
into the mix as well, you all possess the same mental deficiency
genes:

http://www.psi.edu/epo/moon/moon.html

Enjoy ...


  #5  
Old October 23rd 12, 04:05 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,245
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

WE'VE DROPPED ALL OF YOURS, SENILE OLD GOAT!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:25:46 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

Brad it shows imperial thinkers jump on a bad theory,and rather defend
it than admit they goofed. Sad but there are other bad theories that
they won't drop. TreBert

  #6  
Old October 23rd 12, 04:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 6:25*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 23, 9:02*am, Brad Guth wrote:









On Oct 23, 5:44*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:


Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. *Think about the reasons *TeBet


It also has extremely big and yet relatively shallow dents that didn't
manage to destroy it, indicating that it was a well formed and nicely
aged sphere of fused paramagnetic basalt prior to getting impacted, or
simply as having survived a glancing blow by something the size of an
icy Earth that needed an Arctic ocean basin and a seasonal tilt.


Captures via lithobraking seems to be offering a lot better
probability than our peers have been letting on.


At the very least, encountering such an icy planetoid that became our
moon would have caused massive global flooding, among other issues.


*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”


Brad it shows imperial thinkers jump on a bad theory,and rather defend
it than admit they goofed. *Sad but there are other bad theories that
they won't drop. *TreBert


The mainstream status-quo of insiders (mostly public funded) do in
fact apply as much banishment and obfuscation as necessary in order to
put outsiders down. It's another mafia policy of protecting their own
kind, but then so did the ZNR Oligarchs do all they could muster in
order to protect their puppet warlord, Hitler. More recently they did
all they could to support and protect GW Bush and Dick Cheney.
  #7  
Old October 23rd 12, 07:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 6:59*am, "H gar" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...

Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. *Think about the reasons *TeBet


*** Here's a little something for idiots like yourself and that
other dumb-ass GuthBall ... what the hell, let's throw Painintheass
into the mix as well, you all possess the same mental deficiency
genes:

http://www.psi.edu/epo/moon/moon.html

Enjoy ...


The 2500 km diameter crater on our moon obviously didn't destroy it or
even morph it enough to penetrate its extremely thick and fused basalt
crust.

There's a pretty darn good chance, that as an incoming icy planetoid
that it was already a nicely solidified sphere as having its thick and
paramagnetic crust developed similar to what it currently has to
offer.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”
  #8  
Old October 23rd 12, 08:36 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default Proof The Moon was Captured


"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:59 am, "H gar" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...

Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. Think about the reasons TeBet


*** Here's a little something for idiots like yourself and that
other dumb-ass GuthBall ... what the hell, let's throw Painintheass
into the mix as well, you all possess the same mental deficiency
genes:

http://www.psi.edu/epo/moon/moon.html

Enjoy ...


The 2500 km diameter crater on our moon obviously didn't destroy it or
even morph it enough to penetrate its extremely thick and fused basalt
crust.

There's a pretty darn good chance, that as an incoming icy planetoid
that it was already a nicely solidified sphere as having its thick and
paramagnetic crust developed similar to what it currently has to
offer.


*** Gee, that must have come from the Sirius Star System, right ??


  #9  
Old October 23rd 12, 09:54 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,635
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 6:25*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 23, 9:02*am, Brad Guth wrote:





On Oct 23, 5:44*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:


Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. *Think about the reasons *TeBet


It also has extremely big and yet relatively shallow dents that didn't
manage to destroy it, indicating that it was a well formed and nicely
aged sphere of fused paramagnetic basalt prior to getting impacted, or
simply as having survived a glancing blow by something the size of an
icy Earth that needed an Arctic ocean basin and a seasonal tilt.


Captures via lithobraking seems to be offering a lot better
probability than our peers have been letting on.


At the very least, encountering such an icy planetoid that became our
moon would have caused massive global flooding, among other issues.


*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”


Brad it shows imperial thinkers jump on a bad theory,and rather defend
it than admit they goofed. *Sad but there are other bad theories that
they won't drop. *TreBert



If the moon had split off from the Earth, there should have been lots
of water and atmosphere in its early history. No evidence of that.

Double-A

  #10  
Old October 23rd 12, 10:42 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Proof The Moon was Captured

On Oct 23, 12:36*pm, "H gar" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 23, 6:59 am, "H gar" wrote:

"G=EMC^2" wrote in message


...


Its a nice sphere. If blown from Earth lots of good physics would keep
it from ending up so round. Think about the reasons TeBet


*** Here's a little something for idiots like yourself and that
other dumb-ass GuthBall ... what the hell, let's throw Painintheass
into the mix as well, you all possess the same mental deficiency
genes:


http://www.psi.edu/epo/moon/moon.html


Enjoy ...


The 2500 km diameter crater on our moon obviously didn't destroy it or
even morph it enough to penetrate its extremely thick and fused basalt
crust.

There's a pretty darn good chance, that as an incoming icy planetoid
that it was already a nicely solidified sphere as having its thick and
paramagnetic crust developed similar to what it currently has to
offer.

*** Gee, that must have come from the Sirius Star System, right ??


That's only my best guess, simply because Sirius(b) had been
sufficiently nearby and having lost most of its planets as of before
getting to its WD phase.

According to a number of sufficiently respected astrophysics and other
astronomy related science wizards, by now there could be a hundred
thousand spare planets as rogue/wandering nomads per star. So,
there's a lot of spare planet inventory for any given solar system to
pick from, not to mention the really nearby stuff.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 9 July 29th 11 05:24 PM
Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 2 July 26th 11 06:07 PM
Our captured moon(Selene) Bast[_2_] Misc 1 February 6th 10 01:42 AM
Moon bases too far, captured asteroid nearer :-) Bounty Astronomy Misc 1 February 2nd 05 06:11 AM
Three planets and the Moon captured Andy Lawes Amateur Astronomy 6 March 24th 04 01:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.