![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/st...ion-haida.html
1 - Uranus has a polar climate due to its inclination close to 90 degrees from its ecliptic axis 2 - A planet with zero inclination where its daily rotational axis aligns with its ecliptic axis has an equatorial climate as the seasonal fluctuations in daylight/darkness asymmetries would be minimal. 3 The Earth has a largely equatorial climate with a minor solar input. The older perspective of 'no tilt/no seasons' must yield to the proper perspective where zero degree inclination reflects a pure equatorial climate as ,in planetary terms,the terrestrial effects of a polar climate such as that of Uranus can be set off against the Earth's largely equatorial climate. This dangerous situation where people are taking unilateral action based on nothing more than a belief that humans can control the planet's temperature is entirely due to the lack of astronomers .The inability to accept the explanation for the seasons as a consequence of two rotations to the central Sun is presently more important than this reckless situation where real damage is done by empirical modelers. How do any of you do it !,is their some desperate need to destroy the planet for future generations based on nothing more than wishful thinking the Earth as a greenhouse ?. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Koch funded climate scientist reverses thinking - climate change IS REAL! | Uncarollo2 | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | August 8th 12 10:43 PM |
Why Do Old Stars Expand ? | Luminoso | Misc | 17 | May 11th 07 01:40 AM |
HEQ5 synscan V2.5 won't modify rate | pascal | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | November 6th 06 10:23 PM |
Modify QC Pro 4000? | RichardN22 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | January 5th 04 11:45 PM |