The greatest unsolved mysteries of the universe': Dr Paul Francis at ANU, March 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. (Which means there never was nothing) Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

On 6/16/2012 12:22 PM, Metspitzer wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?

The real mystery is why you would bother me with such a stupid question?

No offense.












--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

In article ,
Metspitzer wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. (Which means there never was nothing) Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

The answer is no. Fusion and isotope decay drive nuclei towards iron which has
the lowest energy/nucleon and so the lowest mass/nucleon. That mass is converted
to photons and kinetic energy.

The total mass-energy of any closed system (such as the universe) is assumed
conserved (conservation of energy).

--
Aren't you special. Tell me your problems.

"Aunt Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Other of the Borg"
wrote in message
...
In article ,
Metspitzer wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. (Which means there never was nothing) Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

The answer is no. Fusion and isotope decay drive nuclei towards iron which
has
the lowest energy/nucleon and so the lowest mass/nucleon. That mass is
converted
to photons and kinetic energy.

The total mass-energy of any closed system (such as the universe) is
assumed
conserved (conservation of energy).


You preposterously dumb and ignorant slut !!!
Iron is the very last element created in the fusion process of stars. Iron
absorbs more energy than all the previous fusion processes, and thus gravity
finally wins the battle. If the Star is less than 1.8 solar masses, it
sloughs off
its grotesquely expanded outer shell and ultimately becomes a White Dwarf.
If it has a mass of greater then 1.8 solar masses, a Super Nova will ensue,
which then creates all the heavier than iron elements or metals.
Ultimately, that "Star Stuff" is used to make mental midgets like you.
You're welcome.

On Jun 16, 12:22*pm, Metspitzer wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. *(Which means there never was nothing) *Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

QM Will not allow "Nothing" Energy is intinsic to space. Force of
gravity is intrinsic to the cosmos. To create something from nothing
is not possible. I have posted how the first big bang came to be many
times. TreBert

On Jun 22, 4:27*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Jun 16, 12:22*pm, Metspitzer wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. *(Which means there never was nothing) *Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

QM Will not allow "Nothing" *Energy is intinsic to space. Force of
gravity is intrinsic to the cosmos. *To create something from nothing
is not possible. *I have posted how the first big bang came to be many
times. * TreBert

Yes you have told us many times, and your interpretation as to how
this universe came to be is as good as any. I agree, you can't get
something from nothing, and those many super-duper BHs for creating
galaxies had to exist long before our universe of galaxies plus
everything in between could be created.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth
Venus

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:39:02 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Jun 22, 4:27*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Jun 16, 12:22*pm, Metspitzer wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. *(Which means there never was nothing) *Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

QM Will not allow "Nothing" *Energy is intinsic to space. Force of
gravity is intrinsic to the cosmos. *To create something from nothing
is not possible. *I have posted how the first big bang came to be many
times. * TreBert

Yes you have told us many times, and your interpretation as to how
this universe came to be is as good as any. I agree, you can't get
something from nothing, and those many super-duper BHs for creating
galaxies had to exist long before our universe of galaxies plus
everything in between could be created.

Lawrence Krauss at 14 min.
http://www.colbertnation.com/full-ep...awrence-krauss
Cool shoes

On Jun 22, 8:37*pm, Metspitzer wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:39:02 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth









wrote:
On Jun 22, 4:27*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Jun 16, 12:22*pm, Metspitzer wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19HI...eature=related

One of the greatest unsolved mystery is.........Is the amount of
matter we have now the same as the creation of the universe?
15 min

He says yes. *(Which means there never was nothing) *Shouldn't the
answer be, we don't know.

QM Will not allow "Nothing" *Energy is intinsic to space. Force of
gravity is intrinsic to the cosmos. *To create something from nothing
is not possible. *I have posted how the first big bang came to be many
times. * TreBert

Yes you have told us many times, and your interpretation as to how
this universe came to be is as good as any. *I agree, you can't get
something from nothing, and those many super-duper BHs for creating
galaxies had to exist long before our universe of galaxies plus
everything in between could be created.

Lawrence Krauss at 14 min.http://www.colbertnation.com/full-ep...2012-lawrence-...
Cool shoes

If the original creation or progenitor BH was worth 5e56 kg, and its
polar jets have each been ongoing at an outflux of 2e30 kg/sec, as
such this interpretation could make some sense of it all.