![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes well, I'm still not clear what the love affair with solids is all
about. Obviously, from the pure thrust point of view and their simplicity, they have a lot to commend them, but when you consider you cannot throttle them, stop them once started, and their tendency to vibrate due to the chaotic burning and changing internal capacity, they would seem to be only of use for lifting a lot of heavy fuel such as they tend to be used for in Shuttle and other boosters. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Snidely" wrote in message news:mn.52a87dc5560a86d4.127094@snitoo... JF Mezei explained on 5/10/2012 : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18017216 -Uses an extended SRB for first stage (I believe only a 4 segment one) [...] Why not use an Ariane 5 rocket or Delta 4 and focus on the capsule ? What do you think ATK makes, and how would this influence their engineering decisions? /dps "salt of the earth" -- Who, me? And what lacuna? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 3:22*am, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
Yes well, I'm still not clear what the *love affair with solids is all about. Obviously, from the pure thrust point of view and their simplicity, they have a lot to commend them, but when you consider you cannot throttle them, stop them once started, and their tendency to vibrate due to the chaotic burning and changing internal capacity, they would seem to be only of use for lifting a lot of heavy fuel such as they tend to be used for in Shuttle and other boosters. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. *graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ _________________________*________________________ ___________ "Snidely" wrote in message news:mn.52a87dc5560a86d4.127094@snitoo... JF Mezei explained on 5/10/2012 : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18017216 -Uses an extended SRB for first stage (I believe only a 4 segment one) [...] Why not use an Ariane 5 rocket or Delta 4 and focus on the capsule ? What do you think ATK makes, and how would this influence their engineering decisions? /dps "salt of the earth" -- Who, me? *And what lacuna? there was a thrust termination system? didnt the top open somehow to end thrust? but that doesnt end vibration or the nasties that add to polution....... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 38209e5e-89be-42e3-a34c-
, says... On May 13, 3:22*am, "Brian Gaff" wrote: Yes well, I'm still not clear what the *love affair with solids is all about. Obviously, from the pure thrust point of view and their simplicity, they have a lot to commend them, but when you consider you cannot throttle them, stop them once started, and their tendency to vibrate due to the chaotic burning and changing internal capacity, they would seem to be only of use for lifting a lot of heavy fuel such as they tend to be used for in Shuttle and other boosters. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. *graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ _________________________*________________________ ___________ "Snidely" wrote in message news:mn.52a87dc5560a86d4.127094@snitoo... JF Mezei explained on 5/10/2012 : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18017216 -Uses an extended SRB for first stage (I believe only a 4 segment one) [...] Why not use an Ariane 5 rocket or Delta 4 and focus on the capsule ? What do you think ATK makes, and how would this influence their engineering decisions? /dps "salt of the earth" -- Who, me? *And what lacuna? there was a thrust termination system? didnt the top open somehow to end thrust? On Ariane 5, I believe there is a thrust termination system. It was designed from the beginning to be "man rated". In this case, "man rated" means whatever ESA says it means instead of meaning whatever NASA says it means. ;-) On Liberty, I'd imagine that the first stage is relatively unchanged from Ares I's design. Jeff -- " Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. ![]() - tinker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATK's Liberty rocket hopes to launch in 2015 | Jeff Findley[_2_] | Space Shuttle | 7 | May 16th 12 06:28 PM |
ATK's Liberty rocket hopes to launch in 2015 | Jeff Findley[_2_] | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 11th 12 01:29 PM |
ATKs Liberty Rocket - a joke?? | SENECA@argo.rhein-neckar.de | Policy | 7 | February 14th 11 06:15 PM |
The Liberty rocket is no joke... | Nomen Nescio | Policy | 3 | February 14th 11 04:26 PM |
NASA test rocket explodes (ATK's ALV X-1) | Jeff Findley | Policy | 21 | August 27th 08 06:42 PM |