NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS

On Dec 29, 2:57*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Dec 29, 2:08*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
Your claim was YOU CANNOT *EARN ENOUGH MONEY IN SEVERAL LIFETIMES TO
PAY THE COST PER POUND *LAUNCH COSTS OF NASA FOR A HUMAN BEING.

fred since nasa has no human launcher, and only a new vague plan for a
human launch vehicle in the far future, that will not cut shuttle
costs....

so again i am correct.

the only way the US can launch a human being is by soyuz at err 63
million each.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole, got
caught on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per
pound" to "Russian passenger price".

fred you are as usual being intentionally ignorant.

currently nasa has no manned space capability

the replacement would have shaken so badly the astronauts spleens
would of liquified, besides it cost too much

the latest nasa plan would cost way too much, and take forever to get
operational

the falcon if successful might make it affordable.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole about
"NASA cost per pound" and "several lifetimes of earnings", got caught
on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per pound" to
"Russian passenger price".

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
*soul with evil."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

show me a nasa estimated cost per pound to loft a human.......

On Dec 29, 5:21*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Dec 29, 2:57*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Dec 29, 2:08*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
Your claim was YOU CANNOT *EARN ENOUGH MONEY IN SEVERAL LIFETIMES TO
PAY THE COST PER POUND *LAUNCH COSTS OF NASA FOR A HUMAN BEING.

fred since nasa has no human launcher, and only a new vague plan for a
human launch vehicle in the far future, that will not cut shuttle
costs....

so again i am correct.

the only way the US can launch a human being is by soyuz at err 63
million each.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole, got
caught on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per
pound" to "Russian passenger price".

fred you are as usual being intentionally ignorant.

currently nasa has no manned space capability

the replacement would have shaken so badly the astronauts spleens
would of liquified, besides it cost too much

the latest nasa plan would cost way too much, and take forever to get
operational

the falcon if successful might make it affordable.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole about
"NASA cost per pound" and "several lifetimes of earnings", got caught
on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per pound" to
"Russian passenger price".

show me a nasa estimated cost per pound to loft a human.......

Cost per pound is cost per pound. *Once more time. *In other words,
you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole about "NASA cost per
pound" and "several lifetimes of earnings", got caught on it, and are
now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per pound" to "Russian
passenger price".

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
*soul with evil."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

cost per pound freight is far less than cost per pound human and in
any case provide a link to nasa estimated human costs to orbit.....

Chicken little again. Come back when you have something with more
flesh on the bone

note large cuts in military spending.........

On Jan 8, 11:29*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

Chicken little again. Come back when you have something with more
flesh on the bone

note large cuts in military spending.........

That's what happens when you wind down from fighting a war, you bird
brain.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
*territory."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn

it appears the budget driven changes will exceed just the costs of
winding down 2 wars.

plus have you heard Iraq is destabilizing, and a civil war is coming.
Iran is becoming more important

sure we deposed saddam hussein, but for the people and the region our
meddling just made things worse.

although the military spending has been good for military suppliers,
heck even the body bag ones with so many deaths sales soared........

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:10:25 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

I go by remaining non-relevant idiocy snipped

--
"Ordinarily I am insane. But I have lucid moments when I am
only rock dumb-stupid."
-- Fred J. McCall

The US intelligence apparatus has created it own terrorist
organizations. And at the same time, it creates its own terrorist
warnings concerning the terrorist organizations which it has itself
created.

We can only pray they drone you.