![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To the nearest rotation,the correspondence between 1461 days and 4
years in equating to 1461 rotations in 4 orbital circuits is the most notable and familiar in all science.The upcoming 24 hours of rotation that is February 29th ties in with 4 orbital circuits built around 1461 days/1461 rotations even if the details are not immediately recognizable. They made a mistake in the late 17th century which led to an unseemly imbalance between rotations and days equating to 4 years/4 orbital circuits - "The Earth spins on its axis about 366 and 1/4 times each year, but there are only 365 and 1/4 days per year. " Goddard Space Flight Center The resulting 1465 rotations in 1461 days no longer equates to 4 orbital circuits and is at variance with all known principles,methods,insights,inventions and discoveries which are designed around the equivalency between days/years and rotations/ orbital circuits and most notably the work of John Harrison and the marine chronometer. The mistake does not appear intentional as it was created around an equivalency between daily rotation and stellar circumpolar motion yet it has snowballed and colors just about everything that relates to astronomy and the terrestrial sciences and that color is grey.I have watched this forum disintegrate,for whatever reasons there is a type of herd mentality which knows when to withdraw and nobody can claim that spam is the cause as only 25 messages separate this one in January from a message in July last year. I would like to think that although the error expanded through Royal Society empiricism,its origins are with the Royal observatory and there it must be dealt with effectively and decisively for nothing could be worse than an imbalance between rotations and days as it applies to the calendar convenience and the natural format based on planetary dynamics from which it emerged.Unlike the efforts to restore a balance after the Piltdown Man hoax,this necessary correction cannot wait 40 years or for those whoes reputations and careers are at stake die or move on,this is actually asking those people to willingly take up the challenge of correcting a mistake that got out of hand. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Drake equation | Fons | Misc | 1 | May 17th 07 04:58 PM |
(M1*m1),(p1*p2),(q1*q2) equation.!! | brian a m stuckless | SETI | 4 | December 15th 05 08:46 PM |
M1*m1,p1*p2,q1*q2 equation.!! | brian a m stuckless | SETI | 0 | December 9th 05 08:26 PM |
Equation of time: need the equation itself | [email protected] | Misc | 1 | March 10th 05 05:02 AM |
Drake's Equation | Rich | SETI | 1 | October 8th 03 07:18 PM |