Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)

The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
portrays a right-wing slant.

"The Ruzicka Family" wrote in message ...
The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
portrays a right-wing slant.

Fox can't help it that liberals see any middle position as
'conservative,' which I suppose it is compared to the left wing slant
that CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC have been spewing for years. Many
studies have documented this bias on political coverage, especially
with regard to word choice and segment selection. Did you know that
CNN, ABC, and Newsweek ALL had the exact same information for TWO
WEEKS prior to the story Drudge 'broke' on Monica Lewinski? I
certainly didn't see a delay in Bob Packwood, Anita Hill coverage or
this trumped up Bush Nat'l Guard issue.

Tom Merkle

On or about Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom Merkle made the sensational claim that:
Fox can't help it that liberals see any middle position as
'conservative,' which I suppose it is compared to the left wing slant
that CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC have been spewing for years.

And most conservatives see that middle position as 'liberal'. If one
considers oneself liberal, and someone says something one doesn't agree with,
why must one immediately[1] label that person "conservative"? I, for one, am
tired of getting blasted as either because my opinions are not so monolithic
as most people.

Many
studies have documented this bias on political coverage, especially
with regard to word choice and segment selection.

Real actual studies on a subjective topic? Can you please cite at least one,
I'd love to see such a beast.

[1] I just learned to spell that word today. F**king *FINALLY*.
--
This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | Just because something
It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | is possible, doesn't
No person, none, care | and it will reach me | mean it can happen

(Tom Merkle) wrote in message . com...
"The Ruzicka Family" wrote in message ...
The simple fact that you've established a public pulpit for your opinions
does nothing to make them any more relevant, or even fact-based, than
anyone
else's opinions, so please shelve your feelings of intellectual
superiority.
Particularly since you chose to align yourself with Fox.

-Kim-

LOL The "fair and balanced" news! Aligning oneself with Fox already
portrays a right-wing slant.

Fox can't help it that liberals see any middle position as
'conservative,' which I suppose it is compared to the left wing slant
that CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC have been spewing for years. Many
studies have documented this bias on political coverage, especially
with regard to word choice and segment selection. Did you know that
CNN, ABC, and Newsweek ALL had the exact same information for TWO
WEEKS prior to the story Drudge 'broke' on Monica Lewinski? I
certainly didn't see a delay in Bob Packwood, Anita Hill coverage or
this trumped up Bush Nat'l Guard issue.

it seems to be part of the general divisiveness in the nation these
days. Take my grandfather, for instance. He thinks that anything that
isn't Fox News is "liberal" - and refuses to recognize that all the
major news outlets get stories and info from each other. If confronted
with something truly left wing, like say commondreams.org or Pacifica
radio, he starts spouting anti-Communist rhetoric. All major media are
both biased and delibrately manipulative - just like the politicians
and business interests they serve. Television especially makes the
divides beween people wider, it is structurally hard to show more than
2 sides to a topic on TV.

Tom, I asked a couple days ago in another thread - why do you think
that Meridiani has life waiting right under Opportunity's nose?

josh

Tom Merkle

Tom Merkle wrote:

Did you know that
CNN, ABC, and Newsweek ALL had the exact same information for TWO
WEEKS prior to the story Drudge 'broke' on Monica Lewinski?

Boy, I remember how well that whole thing went for the Republicans; not
only did the impeachment proceedings make them look like a bunch of
completely clueless jerks, but Clinton stiffed them when they wanted him
to resign, and they ended up with both Henry Hyde and Robert Livingstone
in deep doo-doo in the wildly entertaining "infidelity of the week"
scandals.
And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_
will all play out?
With their "friends" being the human equivalent of sharks in a feeding
frenzy, they never need to worry about the Democrats being the the
primary threat to their success. That threat shall always be residing in
their own right wing.

Pat

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:34:09 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:

And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_
will all play out?

That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were
Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the
primary's still at least theoretically in play.

If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on
it.

Rand Simberg wrote:




And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_
will all play out?



That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were
Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the
primary's still at least theoretically in play.

If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on
it.


That's what Rush thinks; but I'd put my money of Matt Drudge being
unable to keep his mouth shut for more than one minute after hearing a
rumor. If Lehane's involved in this, it's very puzzling- as he was
Clark's press secretary, and Clark is expected to endorse Kerry later today.

Pat

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:17:26 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:

That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were
Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the
primary's still at least theoretically in play.

If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on
it.

That's what Rush thinks

I wouldn't know...

but I'd put my money of Matt Drudge being
unable to keep his mouth shut for more than one minute after hearing a
rumor. If Lehane's involved in this, it's very puzzling- as he was
Clark's press secretary, and Clark is expected to endorse Kerry later today.

Clark was the one who said that Kerry might have an intern problem a
few days ago.

Here's something interesting. It was scooped by a blogger a few days
ago.

http://www.watchblog.com/thirdparty/...es/000780.html

It turns out that this isn't just any blogger. It was on a blog run
by this guy:

http://www.camworld.com/about/

Who works for this guy:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguid...larkblog_x.htm

Mysteriouser and mysteriouser, eh?

Rand Simberg wrote:

but I'd put my money of Matt Drudge being
unable to keep his mouth shut for more than one minute after hearing a
rumor. If Lehane's involved in this, it's very puzzling- as he was
Clark's press secretary, and Clark is expected to endorse Kerry later today.

Clark was the one who said that Kerry might have an intern problem a
few days ago.

And Clark is Clinton's boy.

Well, let's see.... who benefits if Kerry implodes in October? That
would be Bush. Who benefits if Kerry implodes now? Hmmm.... can you
say... "Hillary?"

Clark both endorsing and back-stabbing Kerry has all the hallmarks of a
Clinton candidacy. The LAST think Hillary wants is a successful Democrat
in '04...

--
Scott Lowther, Engineer
Remove the obvious (capitalized) anti-spam
gibberish from the reply-to e-mail address

Rand Simberg wrote:

Clark was the one who said that Kerry might have an intern problem a
few days ago.

Here's something interesting. It was scooped by a blogger a few days
ago.

http://www.watchblog.com/thirdparty/...es/000780.html

It turns out that this isn't just any blogger. It was on a blog run
by this guy:

http://www.camworld.com/about/

Who works for this guy:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguid...larkblog_x.htm

Mysteriouser and mysteriouser, eh?


Okay...two questions:
1.) How exactly is Rupert Murdoch involved?
2.) How exactly are the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood involved?

Pat