Asteriods deflected to Sun by Jupiter and Saturn.

On Oct 10, 2:25 pm, Mike Collins wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote:







On Oct 10, 3:06 am, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"Martin Brown" wrote in message

...

On 08/10/2011 09:53, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Oct 8, 1:36 am, "Peter
wrote:
"Martin wrote in message

...

On 08/10/2011 05:07, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Oct 7, 3:01 pm, Chris L wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:56:12 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"

wrote:
I think you're analogy (vacuum cleaner) is a good one to start.

I didn't make that analogy- that would be a very poor example. I was
questioning if you were thinking gravity behaves that way.

You're entitled to present your analysis, go ahead.
Ken

Lets see your "PROOF" first you lying dittohead.

In classical Newtonian physics the capture cross section for inbound
objects scales as the square the radius of the target object (plus a
little slop for any atmospheric friction).

The mass of the central object only determines how quickly the inbound
object whips around the trajectory at perihelion. If you had any kind
of
clue about physics you would know that or be able to work it out on the
back of an envelope from conservation of energy and momentum.

You are wrong as usual. What a surprise. Dittohead science is based on
delusional right wing rhetoric and has no connection to reality.

Regards,
Martin Brown

His calculations are based on "delusional right wing rhetoric" ?

What "delusional right wing rhetoric" would that be, exactly?

This article may be helpful,
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AGUFMSH42B0546A
(I thought it was a post-doctoral study requirement in the 70's).

You don't think. But the URL is extremely informative and *VERY* funny.
(anyone doubting what I say would do well to take a look at the URL, its
incredibly bogus claims and the website of the author)

Exactly how the AGU came to allow their name to be associated with this
incoherent gibberish of buzzword salad is unclear to me but the guy is
even kookier than the dreaded Nancy and her reddish planet Niberu.

Just go and look at his website "firmament-chaos"! Kook-a-doodle do!
Self published delusional raving nutter. Simple test is that the ravings
of a nutter are invariant under application of the Shannonizer. This
abstract passes that test with flying colours...

Anyway, the suggested hypothsis appears sound to me.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

It would - you are another delusional raving nutter and netkook.

Regards,
Martin Brown

No he's not. He is simply engaging in speculation. That some things he
speculates about turn out to be very likely wrong does not make him a
"delusional raving nutter and netkook".

Speaking of which, I am still waiting for the "delusional right wing
rhetoric" which underpins his science as you claimed.

The obvious irony here being the only person who is deluded enough to think
that this has anything to do with politics is you, despite your "rhetoric".
I think I know who the "nutter and netkook" is here, and its the guy who
goes on about politics when discussing science, not the guy who talks
science.

Rave away, "netkook".

The study of solar climatology,

http://img.ibtimes.com/www/articles/...urring-drop-in...

directly impacts Earth climatology.
So we're now compelled to understand Solar Climatology, in a stellar
sense.
While devilishy to detect, a house sized asteroid impacting the Sun
would yield data to displace ignorance.
So a question arises, how do we detect them?
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

None of the facts you are arguing about matter. There is no reason for
asteroids displaced by Jupiter to impact the sun to have an 11 year
periodicity. The distribution of the orbits should be chaotic.

Hi Mike, not sure if I've had the pleasure of communicating with you
yet.
We might imagine -to start- the asteroids are mainly confined within a
'circular torus' (like a donut), however [data pending], said torus
may be
elliptical, as most planet orbits are to varing extents.
The fixed semimajor axis itself is then more likely to have g-
induction from
Jupiter every ~11 yrs.
An interesting factor is the study of 'knots' within the asteroid belt
itself,
very likely they will form.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker