![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 3:58*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Aug 20, 7:37 am, Jerry wrote: On Aug 20, 8:30 am, Poutnik wrote: Satellites do not, but the whole system do. Correct. Bull****. *shrug It is quite amazing how crackpots distort everything that they read. What are you babbling about? *shrug The complete story of why relativistic corrections are needed in GPS is rather long. You need to understand that GPS comprises a Space Segment, a Control Segment, and a User Segment. Nonsense. *Initially, self-styled physicists had laid out a system that suggested relativistic correction if existed, but engineers had outsmarted these idiots and came up with a system that does not require relativistic correction if existed. *shrug Well, from an engineering point of view it's mostly still: Physicists who can't see the difference between GPS and Wireless Telecomm, and Einstein's Electronics design, deserve to work in an elevator. Doctor's who can't see the difference between Holograms. Flash Memory, and QWERTY deserve to do recursive reviews of 1954 DNA Treatises'. In a more thorough analysis, any relativistic correction is basically resetting a counter. *It is merely a software solution and Mr. Wilson had pointed out. *You can fly with cheap oscillations driving your chronological time if you can devise clever ways to synchronize all the satellite chronological time. *System similar to IEEE1588 or NTP should easily suffice, and it is still a software solution. *shrug http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE158...ynchronization [snipped unrelated garbage to make Jerry the **** head looks like someone who knew what it is talking about] Among other functions, these ground stations closely monitor the positions of the satellites, and the master control station sends updated ephemerides information to the satellites as they pass over the large ground-antenna stations. Position correction is a statistical issue. *Relativistic error is a few hundred parts per trillion. *Just how would that affect the positions of each satellite when each is moving at much lower speed than the speed of light? *shrug In order to perform their function, THESE GROUND STATIONS NEED PRECISE TIME. How do they set their clocks? Through the GPS itself. Bull****! *Show analysis. *shrug The ability to distribute precise time is an absolutely essential aspect of the GPS system, since without precise time, the earth- based control stations that monitor the satellites' positions and establish "ground truth" for the system cannot perform their function. The requirement in precision timing of the chronological time applies to only the orbiting satellites and no one else. *shrug *Show your analysis otherwise. *shrug Unless the satellites' clocks are synchronized with ground clocks via the GR correction, there is simply no feasible way for them to distribute time around the globe. This is an absolute myth. *Well, He has had enough with these bull****s from someone who does not even understand Snell’s law. *Your pillar of support who has been 24/7 in its vigilance in spreading lies and bull**** (namely Paul Draper, PD, an ex-professor of physics) had choked on that high-school level physics. *You have absolutely no credibility. *shrug [rest of cyber diarrhea snipped] So, **** off. *shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is the GPS myth unmythbustable? | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 57 | August 22nd 11 09:06 AM |
Dynamicist myth | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 6th 06 08:03 PM |
Another dynamicist myth | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 6th 06 02:44 PM |
Space is just a myth ! | Brian Raab | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 3rd 04 07:47 PM |