|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 14th 11, 04:41 PM
posted to sci.physics,sci.astro
|
|||
|
|||
Do Physicists Understand Their Own Peer-Reviewed Literature?
On 3 ΣΕΞ, 21:45, Aleksandr Timofeev wrote:
I suggest to discuss anew: " "Most of the papers which are submitted to the Physical Review are rejected, not because it is impossible to understand them, but because it is possible. Those which are impossible to understand are usually published." Freeman Dyson, Innovation in Eugene Shubert " https://groups.google.com/group/alt....005a9d9a0c129?... https://groups.google.com/group/alt....frm/thread/fd9... "Most of the papers which are submitted to the Physical Review are rejected, not because it is impossible to understand them, but because it is possible"? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indian Journal of Science and Technology (Peer-Reviewed): Astronomy Research | Jamahl Peavey[_2_] | Research | 7 | January 28th 12 05:10 PM |
| Indian Journal of Science and Technology (Peer-Reviewed): Astronomy Research | Jamahl Peavey | Research | 0 | June 22nd 11 08:51 PM |
| old literature about Ceres as a planet | Eric Chomko | History | 2 | August 30th 06 07:53 PM |
| Literature advice, please... | David Pick | Misc | 2 | July 13th 04 05:18 AM |
Linear Mode
