![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/07/11 01:35, Richard Stephens wrote:
Do we have the technology to build a fully reusable space plane that has the carrying capacity of the Shuttle and that can operate for no more than $50 million per launch? Yes. If so, why isn't NASA doing it? Because, along with Greece, Spain and Ireland, the US has run out of money. In case you hadn't heard, it's China's turn to do the big stuff for the next fifty years or so. I,JM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fixed costs dominate launch costs | Jeff Findley | Policy | 7 | March 6th 07 10:40 PM |
Launch costs to soar | William Elliot | Policy | 0 | January 21st 07 06:55 AM |
Launch costs seem irrelevant | Alex Terrell | Policy | 17 | September 24th 05 04:13 AM |
Manpower and costs for an orbital launch? | MattWriter | Policy | 10 | October 26th 03 07:34 AM |
High Launch Costs - Result of Physics? | Dr John Stockton | Policy | 101 | July 25th 03 12:10 AM |