![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvia Else wrote:
Richard Stephens wrote: I wonder what these recent accidents will do to fusion research. Will the average person think that all nuclear power is the same? The average person avoids irradiated foods because they are radioactive. Of course whatever illogical nonsense folks come up with will be what the average person thinks. Well, they probably would, but I doubt that matters much as far as research is concerned. If and when fusion plants were actually being built around the world, there would have to be some education programs designed to explain why a fusion plant cannot possibly suffer the kinds of problem encountered with fission plants. And don't mention that a lot of the energy is in the form of neutrons that convert the interior of the reactor to radioactive isotopes. The solved-but-prevented-by-politics problem of radioactive waste will not change when we go to fusion. It's been suggested that the earliest important use of fusion as with a fusion torch to process nuclear waste from fission - All the way from the early research through spent fuel rods. One product of such a plant would be mixed oxides of various transuranics. We still need to build fission plants with a technology like the Candu heavy water slow breeders to burn up all that MOX. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/07/2011 12:40 AM, Doug Freyburger wrote:
And don't mention that a lot of the energy is in the form of neutrons that convert the interior of the reactor to radioactive isotopes. The solved-but-prevented-by-politics problem of radioactive waste will not change when we go to fusion. I doubt most people feel that strongly about nuclear waste, as long as it's not dumped nearby. What they care about are events like Chernobyl, and now Fukushima. They would need to be assured that even if a fusion plant is complete wrecked, it still cannot present those kinds of hazard. Sylvia. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|