![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/
Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 3, 6:13*am, bob haller wrote:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/ Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display? no one even has a comment? This war mongered tank would of made a excellent display ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 4 May 2011 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote: On May 3, 6:13*am, bob haller wrote: http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/ Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display? no one even has a comment? This war mongered tank would of made a excellent display ![]() Your post appeared twice and all the replies are on the other one. The response is "yes, this is a good idea." Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 4, 6:26*pm, Brian Thorn wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT), bob haller wrote: On May 3, 6:13 am, bob haller wrote: http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/ Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display? no one even has a comment? This war mongered tank would of made a excellent display ![]() Your post appeared twice and all the replies are on the other one. The response is "yes, this is a good idea." Brian thats wierd I see ONLY this one, and only posted it once |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 4 May 2011 16:16:46 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote: Your post appeared twice and all the replies are on the other one. The response is "yes, this is a good idea." thats wierd I see ONLY this one, and only posted it once The first post is called "I this a good idea?" instead of "Is this..." and is dated three minutes before this thread. Alan, Jeff, Brian G. and I all responded. I noted that ET-122 has performed much better shape than the much newer ET-137 that flew on STS-133. Brian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 5, 8:22*am, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article b40d53d2-be66-4eb2-beff- , says... On May 3, 6:13*am, bob haller wrote: http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/ Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display? no one even has a comment? This war mongered tank would of made a excellent display ![]() I already posted a comment, but I'll do so again. *The tank is fine. * It's been re-worked and re-inspected and should do just fine. * Jeff -- " Solids are a branch of fireworks, not rocketry. :-) :-) ", Henry Spencer 1/28/2011 I sure hope so. Not so much for the shuttle wiring the scrub appears caused by a external short somehere.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I this a good idea? | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 4 | May 5th 11 12:44 AM |
Renewable may not be a good idea. | Double-A | Misc | 3 | January 31st 06 11:50 PM |
If we could would cloning Von Braun be a good idea? | Lou Scheffer | History | 14 | February 24th 04 08:27 PM |
If we could would cloning Von Braun be a good idea? | Hallerb | History | 6 | February 19th 04 01:18 AM |
If we could would cloning Von Braun be a good idea? | Ool | Policy | 3 | February 18th 04 12:33 AM |