![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/04/2011 12:49 AM, bob haller wrote:
-- I feel bad for the workers losing their jobs ![]() well honestly for nasa it doesnt matter since the shuttle is ending and no replacement is coming soon Again you're wrong. The workers won't be unemployed for long - with SpaceX and the other companies developing LV's at an incredible rate of knots, getting trained workers will be difficult without using ex-NASA employees. This is demonstrated by most of the upper echelon of SpaceX employment of late - mostly, if not entirely, ex-NASA. Also, you're wrong about no shuttle replacement coming soon. Dragon will probably fly people in the next two-three years. Boeing is developing the CST-100; then there's Dream Chaser (modified HL-20, a vehicle I favoured some years ago and would be superb for ferry work); New Shepard; and also Prometheus from Orbital Science. Dragon's by far the most advanced of these vehicles where timeline is concerned and will be in operation before the others even have their first launch. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:07:17 +1000, Alan Erskine
wrote: On 27/04/2011 1:49 AM, bob haller wrote: Imagine is 1 in 75 car trips resuled in a disaster accident ![]() Or 1 in 75 airliner trips ended in disaster ![]() Cars don't have a billion parts. Neither do airliners (less than a million for a large passenger jet). And neither vehicle does 3 G's during launch; doesn't travel at up to 27,000km/h; doesn't go into vacuums on a regular basis; and neither vehicle travels through the air at temperatures of thousands of degrees. References online indicate the shuttle has about 2.5 million parts, obviously it depends on how they are counted but I'd hazard a guess that the vast majority will be as a result of the systems that are firmly entrenched in the 1970's and if engineered today would drop by an order of magnitude or more. So still more complex than an airliner but not by a huge amount. -- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 4:26*am, The Other Mike
wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:07:17 +1000, Alan Erskine wrote: On 27/04/2011 1:49 AM, bob haller wrote: Imagine is 1 in 75 car trips resuled in a disaster accident ![]() Or 1 in 75 airliner trips ended in disaster ![]() Cars don't have a billion parts. *Neither do airliners (less than a million for a large passenger jet). *And neither vehicle does 3 G's during launch; doesn't travel at up to 27,000km/h; doesn't go into vacuums on a regular basis; and neither vehicle travels through the air at temperatures of thousands of degrees. References online indicate the shuttle has about 2.5 million parts, obviously it depends on how they are counted but I'd hazard a guess that the vast majority will be as a result of the systems that are firmly entrenched in the 1970's and if engineered today would drop by an order of magnitude or more. *So still more complex than an airliner but not by a huge amount. -- yeah and lack of launch boost escape was a major error, to try and save some bucks. once they went with solids launch boost escape should of been mandatory |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
7 myths about the Challenger shuttle disaster | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 168 | February 16th 06 02:06 AM |
7 myths about the Challenger shuttle disaster | Jim Oberg | History | 201 | February 16th 06 02:06 AM |
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 11th 05 06:32 PM |
Shuttle Disaster Could Have Been Averted. I Was Right! | Rand Simberg | Policy | 0 | August 23rd 03 11:28 PM |
Shuttle-disaster futures market | Jorn Barger | Space Shuttle | 11 | August 9th 03 11:47 PM |