A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Falcon Heavy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old March 31st 11, 03:30 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Falcon Heavy

Snidely wrote:
David Spain scribbled something like ...

You know I wonder if there is a supplemental business to be had here.


I was under the impression that LEO launches that included secondary
payloads was pretty common these days. Several school-based microsats, for
instance. Indeed, the Glory satellite entry in Whicked Foot says
"The Taurus rocket also carried three small CubeSat satellites built by
university students in Montana, Colorado and Kentucky."

So maybe someone is already carrying out that supplemental business.


Well I've read plenty of stories about govt sponsored payloads that let out
extra capacity to smaller players (like schools and universities) but I was
not aware of any commercial business that did so.

You'd think payload aggregation would be a great way to cut the cost of LEO
access to folk w/o deep pockets. Sure you may have to wait longer to get there
(until the bus fills up) but for the dramatic reduction in cost it could well
be worth the wait.

This is just another form of the old value added reseller we see in IT all the
time. Or if you will, leasing cloud computation. It's the same idea.

It'd be kind of fun to design such a bus. I've been thinking about it off and
on today. You could imagine a cylindrical metal cage like device with
compartments running along the long axis of the cylinder, with the inner axis
containing spring or otherwise mechanically triggered devices for ejecting the
payload modules. Each payload module would consist of a smaller cylinder that
fits into the larger. The entire structure would of course have to fit within
the payload fairing of a Falcon 1e and meet its total weight restrictions.

Most compartments would be of a 'standard' size but a few could be double or
even triple sized to hold larger payloads.

As a customer, I would give you the dimensions and the cost to 'rent' space on
the bus. You would have to design your payload to fit within the bus and be
compatible with the bus ejection mechanism, but that is about it.

Once in orbit the outer shell fairing would be ejected, exposing the payload
modules which would then be individually ejected out of the bus using the
ejectors.

It's fun to toy around with ideas like this. I have no clue if $$$ could be
made this way however...

Dave

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1 Pat Flannery Policy 6 November 12th 09 10:41 PM
Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1 Pat Flannery Policy 0 November 9th 09 09:29 PM
Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1 Pat Flannery Policy 0 November 9th 09 09:17 PM
Falcon 9 Heavy vs. Soviet N-1 Pat Flannery Policy 0 November 9th 09 09:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.