Big Bang Proves that Earth is at the Centre of the Universe.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:41:08 -0400, Steve Thompson
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, John Polasek wrote:

Listening to the leaders in modern science, it is clear that the Big
Bang is taken to be an established fact and the CMBR is touted as
further proof.

It is a MODEL, FCS.
Everything is a model that has equations. But just listen to the
solons on the science Channel who tell you how it is (even Morgan
Freeman fer cryi) and they leave not the slightest scintilla of doubt
about the validity of the Big Bang. At the first sign of wavering, the
CMBR appeared as a godsend, but you do know it is easy to prove it's
only a red shift of 1000+, just as has been suspected. I can prove it.
But if there was such a big explosion of mass from a central point,
then from common potential theory, there would still exist that same
center of mass at the origin.

It is not an explosion.
OK, not an explosion.
How about an isotropic, spontaneous, radially directed emanation of
the entire mass that comprises our universe, (is that better?) which
would, in the normal course of things, demark the center of that mass
and the mass center of the universe?
How is it that in this ideal set of circumstances, that after the
objective application of Hubble's law (from Earth and then e.g. from
Arcturus) that we are forced to abandon the idea of a radial distance
from a point and default to the dynamics of the dustbin?
Don't you have any misgivings about the Big Bang?
John Polasek