![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During one media interview with the joint ISS & STS-133 crews, it
was mentioned that after Discovery leaves, they plan to move the Japanese HTV vehicle from Node 2's zenith port (where it had been relocated to avoid blocking the shtutle cargo bay) back to its usual Node 2 nadir berthing position, and that this procedure would take about six hours. It was also said that HTV is due to leave the station for reentry within a few weeks. I was just wondering why they'd bother to take so much time moving HTV back, and put extra wear on the Node 2 CBM mechanisms in light of its imminent departure. I understand these vehicles must first approach from the nadir side because of where the alignment sensors are on Kibo, but does the same contraint apply for unberthing? Why couldn't the station arm just move HTV down to to the nadir side of the station at that time (without reberthing it), release it close to the usual spot, and let its internal guidance take over from there? -- Jordan. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/07/2011 09:23 AM, Jordan wrote:
During one media interview with the joint ISS& STS-133 crews, it was mentioned that after Discovery leaves, they plan to move the Japanese HTV vehicle from Node 2's zenith port (where it had been relocated to avoid blocking the shtutle cargo bay) back to its usual Node 2 nadir berthing position, and that this procedure would take about six hours. It was also said that HTV is due to leave the station for reentry within a few weeks. I was just wondering why they'd bother to take so much time moving HTV back, and put extra wear on the Node 2 CBM mechanisms in light of its imminent departure. I understand these vehicles must first approach from the nadir side because of where the alignment sensors are on Kibo, but does the same contraint apply for unberthing? Yes. Why couldn't the station arm just move HTV down to to the nadir side of the station at that time (without reberthing it), release it close to the usual spot, and let its internal guidance take over from there? Less reach, HTV would be too close at release. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jorge R. Frank wrote: On 03/07/2011 09:23 AM, Jordan wrote: During one media interview with the joint ISS & STS-133 crews, it was mentioned that after Discovery leaves, they plan to move the Japanese HTV vehicle from Node 2's zenith port (where it had been relocated to avoid blocking the shtutle cargo bay) back to its usual Node 2 nadir berthing position, and that this procedure would take about six hours. It was also said that HTV is due to leave the station for reentry within a few weeks. I was just wondering why they'd bother to take so much time moving HTV back, and put extra wear on the Node 2 CBM mechanisms in light of its imminent departure. I understand these vehicles must first approach from the nadir side because of where the alignment sensors are on Kibo, but does the same contraint apply for unberthing? Yes. Why couldn't the station arm just move HTV down to to the nadir side of the station at that time (without reberthing it), release it close to the usual spot, and let its internal guidance take over from there? Less reach, HTV would be too close at release. Ah... makes sense now. Thanks! -- Jordan. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Station Node 2 'Moves' Toward Major Milestone | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | March 9th 05 09:34 PM |
Node 3 officially added back into station design... | Peter Altschuler | Space Station | 7 | July 26th 04 01:35 AM |
Node 3 launch date? | Explorer8939 | Space Station | 0 | February 23rd 04 09:56 PM |
Intellectual nadir | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 10 | January 15th 04 05:59 PM |
US Node 3 free but for want of a launch | bitflip | Space Station | 9 | July 18th 03 03:41 AM |