![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.policy message
, Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:52:21, Brian Thorn posted: It looks to me that they need the second Orion for its propulsive component too (its second Service Module), not just storage for extra food and water. If it were just needed for storage for the long flight, an MPLM or ATV pressurized module would do just fine, and could be bought off the shelf. (ATV itself could be a good alternative if NASA wants to make it an international flight.) ATVs are not exactly off-the-shelf; rather, built-as-required. Also, the standard ATV includes propulsion, though not high-thrust. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms and links; Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enter the Dragon? | MO | Policy | 10 | July 18th 08 11:52 PM |
Space-X Dragon | Jeff Findley | Policy | 46 | February 19th 07 04:35 PM |
NASA Chief Says Future Flights Will Force Cutbacks in Science | Rick Evans | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | April 29th 06 02:52 AM |
NASA grounds future shuttle flights | Jim Davis | Policy | 28 | August 10th 05 03:29 PM |