![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it seems that your doomed to see what you call "ancient fossil light " as
even Light itself has a limit of the speed it can go. Heck, while short, look at the time it takes light to reach Earth from our own sun. -- "In this universe the night was falling,the shadows were lengthening towards an east that would not know another dawn. But elsewhere the stars were still young and the light of morning lingered: and along the path he once had followed, man would one day go again." Arthur C. Clarke, The City & The Stars SIAR www.starlords.org Freelance Writers Shop http://www.freelancewrittersshop.netfirms.com Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord "Scribe2b" wrote in message ... So, putting it to a vote, which would you rather have: instantaneous news from the edge of a possibly much bigger universe or stale news from a possibly much more varied past? i would rather have both. 1--- the ancient fossil light for astro-archaeology. 2--- an immediate relevant source of imaging for NOW. then we would know a great deal more jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/03 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|