![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 5, 8:08*am, badastrobuster wrote:
On Nov 4, 11:49*pm, oriel36 wrote: I had hoped even an anonymous reader would take a crack at normal language and explain it to you instead of that robotic statement you just made. Remember Kelleher simulates stupidity to annoy, frustrate and generally wind-up people. If you don't believe me let's do a little test. I do not condescend to readers or put them to the test,the question as to where the polar daylight/darkness cycle comes from more or less takes care of the dynamical insight into the orbital behavior of the Earth as it turns slowly and unevenly to the central Sun.There is an analogy by imitation where a broom handle substitutes for daily rotation and the polar coordinates and the line of a person's body and the specific way they walk around a central object (while keeping the broom handle pointing consistently to the same external point) as a means to imitate the orbital behavior of the Earth.It takes all of a few minutes to put the analogy and observations in order and as different rules now apply,I would be indifferent to people who can't interpret the information properly whereas before there was room for refining the insight and the analogy. Kelleher wrote "on acknowledging the slow and uneven orbital turning of the Earth to the central Sun" So Gerald please explain in extreme detail what you mean by this. After the dynamical inputs are in order,then the real work begins.A person who resides at polar latitudes is not fried during the time he experiences constant solar radiation during the 6 month period where the Sun is visible,this gets rid of the tendency to reference temperature fluctuations between January and July based on inclination to solar radiation and puts emphasis on planetary dynamics where the major cause of temperature fluctuations belong.The general rule is that the greater the variations in daylight/darkness amounts at different latitudes tend to follow greater variations in temperature fluctuations over an orbital cycle such as experienced between equatorial and polar regions in such a way that the focus shifts away from localized inclination to solar radiation and takes more stock of the modifying factors between latitudes, In short,once you ask the question about the polar daylight/darkness cycle you have already begun to investigate the orbital component and almost answer the question without any prompting,from experience I see that it is already common knowledge even without making it into mainstream literature and have absolutely no doubt that readers here partly see how large a modification it actually is.Possibly somebody could go some way to put the explanation into graphical form for the first time where a combination of daily rotation and orbital motion to the central Sun takes care of the major astronomical components in the seasonal explanation and almost the sole reason why natural noon cycles vary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two blue blood vessel remains beautifully preserved—one on Mars for 3 billion years, the other in Pennsylvania for 300 million years. | Lin Liangtai | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 9th 08 03:47 PM |
Two blue blood vessel remains beautifully preserved—one on Mars for 3 billion years, the other in Pennsylvania for 300 million years. | Lin Liangtai | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 9th 08 03:47 PM |
We Have Less Than 8 Million Years To Live! | [email protected] | Misc | 16 | February 24th 07 05:54 AM |
We Have Less Than 8 Million Years To Live! | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 1 | February 1st 07 07:19 PM |
100 million years ago | Zague | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | December 15th 04 08:14 PM |