![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems to me that Celestron advertises the C9.25 as being optimized for
imaging and for visual applications using 2" eyepieces. How about the William Optics 2" SCT diagonal for $99 and a BW Optik 30mm WideScan for $95. I doubt you will have good success using this combo with the r/c, but without, it will give you about as wide a field as is possible. -Stephen "Alex Vukasin" wrote in message news:qdJ4b.243048$cF.77201@rwcrnsc53... I've got an ultima 9.25 f/10 with the standard Celestron 25mm Plossl EP that came with it. I also have a TeleVue 13mm Plossl. In addition, I've got 10 and 20 Celestron Plossls. On top of those, I've got an f/6.3 focal reducer and a Celestron 2x barlow sv series. So, with the eyepieces I currently have, I can have several different combinations of power. Yet I feel as though I should have a larger (wider field of view) eyepiece. The question is, which one. Of course it all comes down to price and I'd prefer not to have to spend more than 300-350 on it. What reccomendations might y'all have? Thanks Alex |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centering stars without a reticle eyepiece | justbeats | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 22nd 03 01:24 PM |
*Review: Astrosystems 30mm WIDE SCAN III Eyepiece | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 8th 03 05:53 AM |
more about Mars magnification | Mick | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | July 25th 03 10:11 AM |
Newbie Eyepieces 101 | BenignVanilla | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | July 21st 03 03:50 PM |